Showing posts with label student debt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label student debt. Show all posts

12 May 2014

U. S. Supreme Court OKs More Theocracy; Defiant Workers Mobilize Nationally for $15 Minimum Wage

FR. WILLIAM BICHSEL S.J., the 87-year-old radical Roman Catholic priest who has been repeatedly jailed by USian Empire authorities in retaliation for his support of world peace, urges $15 Now activists to persevere in their nonviolent efforts despite the intensification of capitalist opposition. For details, see “$15 Now Tacoma Rallies in Downpour,” below. (Photograph by Loren Bliss copyright 2014; click on image to view it full size.)


*
AT FIRST GLANCE, the two statements in the above headline may seem unrelated, perhaps even two halves of a perplexing non sequitur
But on further reflection we see they are opposite sides of the same proverbial coin, just as Fr. Bichsel – Bix to his friends and comrades – represents an ancient but revolutionary interpretation of Christianity that is the antithesis of the authoritarian, pro-capitalist dogmas espoused by the theocrats and their enablers.

Prompted by the oppressive example of how Christian theocracy polices the former Confederacy, the One Percent and the Ruling Class in general have long been major financiers and facilitators of the campaign to impose Biblical Law on the USian homeland – this as the most successful means of suppressing anti-capitalist dissent. And just last week, the U.S. Supreme Court hastened the national march toward a Christian state and state Christianity, ruling that government-sponsored public prayers can now be addressed exclusively to Jesus.

The court also effectively said anyone who is offended by such theological discrimination can go to hell.

Meanwhile, the $15 Now movement – which was begun by Kshama Sawant and Socialist Alternative to counteract the selfsame capitalist savagery the expansion of Christian theocracy is intended to justify and preserve – has exploded across the USian homeland and is catching fire even in overseas realms of the USian global empire.

In the context of this growing rebellion, the Supreme Court's decree becomes doubly significant. It's obvious intent is to back the nation further away from the constitutionally mandated separation of church and state, thereby thrusting us closer to the Taliban-like Biblical-Law dictatorship long sought by the lavishly funded Christian fanatics. But its clandestine purpose – note the court's obvious anti-democracy bias – is clearly to bolster the white Christian prosperity-gospel prohibitions against organized labor, especially any notion the USian Working Class deserves better pay and conditions.

Exemplifying these restrictions, white Christian fanaticism in the South has long been a formidable barrier to unionization, also to women's rights, racial or sexual equality and intellectual freedom in general. The white Southern workforce is conditioned from birth to believe bosses and aristocrats are god's chosen representatives and that disobeying or even questioning their orders is therefore a sin. Observing the results in a century-long succession of debacles like the recent defeat of the United Auto Workers union at the Chattanooga Volkswagen plant, the One Percenters have concluded Abrahamic theocracy is capitalism's best friend. That's why USian policy invariably favors Christian theocracy in the homeland and various other forms of theocracy throughout the empire, Judaic in Israel, Islamic in the remainder of the Middle East.

Thus the implacably pro-plutocracy Supreme Court overturned a longstanding judicial precedent that required public prayer to be non-sectarian, referencing a deity only in the most generic terms. The former policy, as explained to The Washington Post by George Washington University Law Professor Ira Lupu (see the “exclusively to Jesus” link above) was intended to make public prayer mutually acceptable to the followers of all three Abrahamic religions, and to render it at least not gravely objectionable to Buddhists, Wiccans, First Nations traditionalists and any others including agnostics or atheists.

The widespread imposition of prayer to open public meetings and other governmental proceedings including public school ceremonies and sporting events was begun about the same time the phrase “under God” was added to the national pledge of allegiance.  (See also Jeff Sharlet's The Family: the Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power, Harper: 2008; pgs. 195-204, especially pgs. 198-199.) As critics have been pointing out ever since, the addition of that phrase to the pledge in 1954 was the declaration that formally set the nation on its present-day course toward theocracy.

And now, thanks to the court's newest religious ruling, it is legal to flaunt Christianity as if it were the one state-approved religion, thereby theologically spitting in the faces of all non-Christians.

Those of us who are offended by the references to Jesus or to the Christians' triune god of Father, Son and Holy Ghost, says the court, can simply “leave the room” – never mind such public acts of dissent will, in many parts of the USian interior, surely invite a visit from the Ku Klux Klan or some other vigilante group.

Nor, as I can personally attest, are such realms limited to the South, where the Klan functions much like the dread Islamic morality police and is therefore colloquially known as “the Saturday Night Men's Bible Study Class.” Parts of Whatcom County, Washington – the northernmost county in the lower 48 states – are similarly “policed” by JesuNazi vigilantes.

Earlier OAN reports documenting the escalating threat of Christian theocracy are herehere  and here.  Other relevant reports on the the court's new endorsement of Christian supremacy are here and here.  Another oppressive aspect of USian Christian theocracy – the purity ball, a public ritual in which young girls are forced to pledge to their fathers they'll be totally chaste until they give themselves to men in male-supremacist marriage – is covered here.

******

Conditions in Ukraine continue to deteriorate into warfare as neo-Nazi stormtroopers, now part of Kiev's “national guard,” repeatedly assault enclaves of pro-Russian separatists. Meanwhile the putsch regime in Kiev is being advised by USian Empire secret agents, much as the Saigon regime was advised during the early stages of the Vietnam War. Given the givens, I can only hope the USian drive for global domination, which in this instance is tantamount to goading a mother bear in her own den, does not trigger World War III. Here, In Case You Missed It, is an anthology of last week's most telling dispatches:

Putting the Ukraine Crisis in Context,” a Consortium News analysis by William Blum and “What Obama Can Do to Save Ukraine” by Robert Parry are probably the most vital of these reports. The former reveals additional historical and geopolitical details of how USian aggression precipitated the crisis. The latter implies President Obama has lost control of his administration, a chilling likelihood further detailed by “Putin's Subtle Message to Obama,” another of Parry's superb reports.  The remainder, “Burning Ukraine's Protestors Alive,” also by Parry, and “Odessa Atrocity Erupts in Peaceful City and No One Wonders Why?,” by William Boardman for Reader Supported News, portray the neo-Nazi horrors that have begun to characterize the crisis.


******

More Indications the President Is Secretly a White Republican: Momentarily displaying his former Obama the Orator persona and his now obviously bogus promise of “change we can believe in,” the Janus-faced USian president (sort of) condemned skyrocketing income inequality but then demonstrated his true Barack the Betrayer values by honoring Wal-Mart as a leader in the fight for environmental sustainability – a claim that is  a huge exaggeration  if not an outright Big Lie. Though Obama's Wal-Mart endorsement has already generated an angry petition campaign, his heartfelt fondness for the nation's most anti-union employer is proven by his appointment of former Wal-Mart Foundation President Sylvia Mathews Burwell to head the Department of Health and Human Services, for which see the “huge exaggeration” link above. The appointment indicates the petition will be ignored – if not passed on to the various secret police agencies to fulfill the Father Gapon function  of identifying any and all opponents of capitalism and capitalist governance.

Meanwhile the prospect of federal health and welfare programs administered by a Wal-Mart executive makes perfect and terrifying sense in the context of a president who slashed food stamps, killed single-payer/public-option health care, sandbagged the Employee Free Choice Act and just issued yet another gag-order directive that (again) proves his promise of “governmental transparency” was just another Big Lie.

******

An analysis by Crosscut, the Seattle on-line daily, “How the Metro Transit vote ran into a deep ditch,” says the resounding defeat of the recent mass-transit sustainment-measure was inflicted by “alienated suburban voters... (expressing a mindset) that cannot simply be attributed to anti-transit sentiments.” The piece, published on Friday 9 May, is written as if it were a response to my OAN column of Sunday 4 May, “Exclusive: How a Local Transit Crisis Exemplifies the Global Class War,” which cites the “transit is welfare” meme and defines anti-transit activism as part of the One Percent's war against any government service that benefits the 99 Percent. The comment thread associated with “deep ditch” gives me an opportunity for Outside Agitation Elsewhere: I argue at length the real cause of the defeat is a suburban shift to the Hard Right – a change also manifest in the (permanent) Republican takeover of the Washington State Senate – never mind the fact Seattle's PollyAnna progressives are loathe to recognize its reality.

******

Thom Hartmann asks, “Are Banksters responsible for autism?” He then praises various measures by individual members of Congress, bills that – if ever enacted – might indeed ease the nation's inconceivably oppressive student debt. But I recognize all of these efforts will never become law and are therefore nothing more than maliciously deceptive Big Lies, intended to opiate increasingly angry students into believing relief might actually be forthcoming:

Lifetime enslavement by student debt will never be eliminated in the U.S. precisely because the One Percent views it as a primary method of suppressing student activism – which is precisely the motive behind the policies that created the indebtedness.

Indeed, the rationale for targeting students and academics – academe damned as "the single most dynamic source" of anti-capitalist resistance – is the primary topic of the infamous Powell Memo of 1971,  which is widely considered the original operations plan for the imposition of zero-tolerance Ayn Rand fascism on the USian homeland. (The memo is reprinted in full here.)

Meanwhile Sen. Elizabeth Warren's interest-reduction measure, like Mr. Hartmann's notion of  a jubilee of student-debt abolition, are nothing more than pie-in-the-sky manifestations of the imbecility of hope.  Neither Sen. Warren's mildly ameliorative bill nor any other genuinely humanitarian measure will ever again be enacted by the U.S. Congress simply because the Republican majority in the House has been gerrymandered into permanence.

This means de facto Republican control of the U.S. government is literally forever. It will not end – it cannot be ended – until the entire system is overthrown or the nation itself is toppled, most likely by the looming environmental apocalypse, at which point the entire student debt issue becomes moot. 

Until then – precisely as the diabolically clever, inconceivably powerful  One Percent intend – impossible-to-enact initiatives Ms. Warren and her ilk will perpetuate the Big Lie of USian representative democracy even as we of the peasantry and proletariat, students and professors included,  are driven ever deeper into slavery.

***

Another Hartmann piece, “Austerity 'savings' are built on 'blood money,'” details how austerity kills. I emphatically agree:

As I say almost every week in OAN, "austerity" is nothing more than a euphemism for genocide: the deliberate extermination of the Working Class. albeit without the odium of death camps.  Such is capitalist governance: absolute power and unlimited profit for the Ruling Class, total subjugation for all the rest of us. In other words, fascism.

******

Different Strokes from Different Folks: I got at least three thumbs-up clicks on the Reader Supported News comment thread of “The Bundy Ranch Militia Is Wearing Out Its Welcome,” Sara Morrison's 5 May report on the aftermath of the now-infamous retreat of federal officers from vigilantes gathered to protect an anti-government scofflaw. But when I posted an abbreviated but pointedly relevant form of the same speculation on the RSN thread of “Disturbing New Pictures of the Arrest of Cecily McMillan,” Michelle Dean's text of 7 May that accompanies Stacy Lanyon's photos of the incident, I got nine thumbs down.

Here is what won three thumbs-up on the “Bundy Ranch” thread:

The probable significance of the government's alleged retreat is at least as terrifying as Barack the Betrayer's National Defense Appropriations Act and its Supreme-Court-approved repeal of the Bill of Rights.
 
The alleged retreat may be an act of accommodation and alliance rather than an act of surrender. If so, it is directly analogous to Obama's appointment of the Christofascist Rick Warren to give the 2009 inaugural invocation. Just as Rev. Warren's appointment gave the Biblical Law theocrats the clandestine kiss of Obamanoid acceptance and encouragement, so too might the regime's departure from the Bundy Ranch communicate acceptance and encouragement to the burgeoning USian neo-Nazi movement and its storm-trooper “militia.”

Like the Rev. Warren appointment, the withdrawal could be a telling indication of how the Obama Regime sees our future – a scenario in which opposition from the Left becomes so overpowering, the government can defend itself only by open alliance with the extreme Right – exactly as occurred in Germany at the end of the Weimar Republic.

This is the likelihood that links the gestures to Rev. Warren and the storm troopers with NDAA, the slaying of the Bill of Rights and the total-surveillance apparatus of the emergent USian secret-police state. As others have noted, were the Bundy Ranch defenders from Occupy, by now they would all be dead or disappeared.

All of which suggests the crude and repugnant portrayal of Obama as a second Hitler may have been eerily prophetic.

And here is what got nine thumbs-down – two days later and still with no militia arrests – on the “Disturbing New Pictures” thread:

The obvious conclusion (to be drawn from the contrast between the government's ongoing tolerance of the armed Bundy Ranch militia and the persecution of unarmed and nonviolent Occupy Movement activists) is the Obama Regime is tacitly siding with the militia – no doubt because because its long-range fascist agenda is so bottomlessly malevolent, the regime and its One Percent masters believe it will need all the help it can get – vigilante militia, Ku Klux Klan, American Nazi Party, armed Tea Baggers, whatever – to suppress the additional Leftist resistance that's bound to arise. That's why a terrifying example is being made of Ms. McMillan – same reason the regime is trying so hard to start World War III in Ukraine.

Why the big difference in the Rule of Thumbs? I've no idea, particularly since my other comments on the “Pictures” thread – a discussion of the photos themselves – drew clicks of approval. Perhaps on that thread, the Obama-can-do-no-wrong disciples – of whom there remain far too many on the USian Left – were out in force.

******

$15 Now Tacoma Rallies in Downpour: Especially during the Pacific Northwest Coast's rainy season, which lasts nearly nine months, the increasingly painful arthritis in my spine and shoulders often dissuades me from photographing. Though back in the day I comfortably carried three cameras, typically two M Leicas around my neck and a single-lens reflex off my right shoulder, now even one camera around my neck quickly becomes uncomfortable. And the combined weight of two cameras – as I was using to shoot the $15 Now Tacoma rally on 3 May – has left me hurting ever since, with a stiff nagging soreness in my upper back, neck and right shoulder I haven't yet managed to wriggle out from under.

Nevertheless the effort was worth it, both for the rally itself, which despite the rain drew about 100 persons, and for the work it produced, more of which – including digital camera and cellphone imagery by other photographers, is on the $15 Now Tacoma Facebook page.  Never mind the weather – I shelter my cameras with an old GI poncho – it was damn nice to be out photographing again, and the fact the event produced two pictures I'd have considered portfolio pieces back in those thrilling days of yesteryear more than compensates for the aftermath of lingering geriatric discomfort. The two pix are the portrait of Father Bix above (which perhaps because I recognize him as a genuine saint reminds me of an old-time holy card), plus a lucky grabshot, also in black-and-white, of a rally-visitor's kid joyfully running across the rainy meadow of Tacoma's People's Park, for which see the Facebook link.

(Disclosure: I am a member of the $15 Now Tacoma Organizing Committee and in that capacity was also manning an informational table at the rally.)

Photo data: Pentax MX, Tokina f/4 70-210mm zoom (mostly at 210mm and f/5.6), Sigma f/4 35-70mm zoom (mostly at 35mm and f/5.6), Fujicolor 800 and Kodak Professional BW400CN, the latter the last two rolls of a batch I'd stored in my refrigerator since 2008. One MX body contained the color, the other MX the B/W, and I switched the lenses back and forth as necessary. Exposing about 50 24-exposure rolls of the BW400CN for a commissioned story c. 2006-2008, I had discovered its actual daylight ASA is closer to 600, and I set the meters accordingly. Yes, even after years of shooting color, I still see better in chiaroscuro.

LB/11 May 2014

-30-

07 July 2013

Real Leftists Know Capitalism Is Too Evil to Reform

“Human Rights Not Corporate Rights”/“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable”: another of my hitherto unpublished Occupy Tacoma images, as relevant now as when it was new. (The more conventionally journalistic pictures were published by Reader Supported News as the story developed in 2011 and 2012.) Pentax MX, 100mm SMC Pentax f/2.8, Fujicolor 800, exposure data not recorded; posterization by Gimp Image Editor. Photograph by Loren Bliss copyright 2013. (Click on image to view full size.)

*

(Note: Apparently when I boasted last week of feeling too healthy to work, I called down the wrath of the gods. That very night I was smitten by a nasty bug, which kept me bedridden six days and for which I am still taking antibiotics.) 

***

SOMETIMES WHEN I write a comment for some other website, the result is so relevant I have no doubt it should be included here. Far more infrequent is the comment that expands into its own Outside Agitator's Notebook essay, and the comment that does so in such a way it suggests its own illustration from my stock photo files is downright rare. But that is what happened when I involved myself in a discussion about capitalism that was sparked by Charles Pierce's most recent report on how the breathtakingly outspoken but tragically ineffectual Sen. Elizabeth Warren is living up to her poignantly defiant post-election pledge,  “I won't just be your senator, I'll be your champion.” Pierce's piece titled “Senator Warren Won't Be Taking Your BS,” was picked up by Reader Supported News from Esquire magazine on 5 July, and is well worth reading, not the least for its combative joy. But as I was quick to point out in the subsequent discussion – though I said it there in far more gentle terms – anyone who still truly believes capitalism can be reformed is either in stubborn denial of the past 80 years of USian history or is suffering from clinical dementia.

In this context, Sen. Warren's heroic efforts – and they are indeed so heroic, some of us who remember the fates of Sen Paul Wellstone and Sen. Robert Kennedy have already begun to fear for her life – are a morality play, (yet another) teachable moment in the nature of capitalism. It is capitalism, remember, that seeks its ultimate fulfillment via fascism and Nazism: think not just of Hitler and Mussolini, whom Wall Street financed into power, but of the imperial USian puppets Francisco Franco, Fulgencio Batista, Anastasio Somoza Debayle and Augusto Pinochet, not to mention Ngo Dinh Diem and the Shah of Iran. Now, today, it is capitalism matured into fascism that, albeit without the strutting dictators, has been elevated into the ruling ideology of the United States by the Mein Kampf equivalents written by Ayn Rand. (“Mein kampf” means “my struggle,” which beneath its specific historical identity is nevertheless the same theme of übermenschen versus üntermenschen that Rand later spelled out in her own tedious prose.) And now in its strident opposition to Sen. Warren's humanitarian courage, it is the Randite brand of capitalism-cum-fascism that is revealing itself by its ever-more-brazen embrace of the traditional fascist paradigm. Nothing more need be said about a federal policy that – as if to punish any youth of the 99 Percent who dares aspire toward a college education – deliberately condemns entire generations to choose between lifetimes of indentured servitude or “voluntary” service to the empire in its cannon-fodder legions.

Hence when a reasonably articulate poster on the Charles Pierce thread wrote of “peaceful protest” as a means of forcing capitalism to “respond to the 'priorities of the people,'” I replied with what to me is the most painfully obvious lesson of all USian history: that capitalism will never “respond to the 'priorities of the people.'” Why? Because capitalism, by definition, responds only to the priorities of the One Percent to produce more wealth at maximum profit – which invariably means maximum wretchedness imposed on the 99 Percent. Thus the only way to achieve the "priorities of the people" is to abolish capitalism. Which (necessarily revolutionary) step the USian 99 Percent is too viciously oppressed and fearfully bigoted and greedily self-absorbed by trinket materialism to ever dare take, peacefully or otherwise. Forget Occupy; stop fantasizing about progressive resistance movements that will never again be allowed to develop beyond the political equivalent of embryos, their partial-birth abortions the precise fulfillment of the domestic Gestapo purpose of the USian total surveillance state. Note instead the obvious examples of the South and the flyover midlands. Observe how so many 99 Percent USians cut their own throats economically by habitually voting for reactionary politicians and causes. And note too how the same trends have metastasized far beyond their signature domains.
 
The busy Pacific Northwest seaport city of Tacoma, Washington provides an especially repugnant example. I have lived here twice, the first time from 1978 through 1982, the second time since 2004, and I will no doubt die here. Though I have harped long and bitterly on the manner in which an overwhelming majority of Tacoma and Tacoma-area voters were persuaded by the meme “transit is welfare” to destroy their own local public transport system, it is a story that demands far more widespread notoriety than ever I can provide. The destruction was inflicted via two elections, the first in 2011, the second in 2012. The earlier election resulted in a 55-45 landslide defeat for pro-transit forces. It should have taught transit advocates the alleged pro-transit majority within the city of Tacoma is too Ayn-Rand hateful toward public-transport users to get off its socioeconomically bigoted arse and vote to sustain a service desperately needed by local lower-income people. Nor is this condemnation unfair; voting in Washington state takes only the physical effort required to mail in a ballot, and the class and racial conflicts inherent in the election were made obvious from the beginning of the 2011 campaign. But transit advocates remained blind to the realities underlying the defeat – a textbook example of how suppression of the historical truth of class-struggle cripples accurate analysis. Hence they merely hoped for the best in 2012, persisting in their refusal to acknowledge the bipartisan magnitude of local hostility toward lowest-income peoples – never mind the huge irony that most of the anti-transit voters are themselves only a little better off. While the second outcome seemed misleadingly close – in the unofficial results available to me on 25 November 2012, the anti-transit majority was only 695 votes – an additional 15,400 so-called “under-votes” indicate the real anti-transit majority is much larger. (Under-votes are otherwise filled-out ballots cast by people too disdainful of transit and transit users to mark a preference on the save-transit measure.) Not only do the under-votes echo the ruinously low turnout in the February 2011 results; for that very reason they seem to provide an accurate yardstick for measuring the true magnitude of anti-transit sentiment. That this is a valid hypothesis is substantiated by (A), the entire Seattle-Tacoma region's 44-year anti-transit history (at least seven of at least nine proposals rejected since 1968, a result documentably linked to xenophobia and bigotry), and (B), by various statements made by the voters themselves, typically to the effect “I won't vote against the poor, but I don't believe in coddling those people with welfare either.” Thus the anti-transit vote becomes a microcosm of the class hatreds that now characterize the USian political macrocosm. It is also probably the national unveiling of the newest and perhaps most vicious form of gentrification the Randite forces have yet conceived. 

I have been told the local transit authority used the approximately the same reasoning about the significance of the unprecedented number of under-votes when it made its own determination that further electoral efforts are pointless. In other words – particularly given the region's anti-transit history (which, by the way, proves its haughty claims to environmental enlightenment are rank hypocrisy if not Big Lies) – there is no antidote to the class-warfare poisons stirred up by the “transit is welfare” meme. Despite the hardships characteristic of the (permanent) oppressiveness of the USian economy and the increasingly zero-tolerance totalitarianism of the total-surveillance state the Ayn Rand fascists have imposed for their own protection, the USian masses remain hopelessly reactionary. They continue to identify with the oppressor, imagining that with but a little good luck, they too can be magically elevated into the One Percent aristocracy, never mind even the mainstream propaganda media now admits entry to such circles is by heredity only. Thus – ultimately because its Working Class refuses to recognize itself as such – Tacoma and its environs have already become notorious for their lack of adequate public transport. Indeed their self-inflicted shortcomings are the worst in all the comparably urbanized locales of the United States – and therefore they are the worst in the entire industrial world. If long-range projections are correct, the area will within a few more years have no local transit at all. When that happens, tens of thousands of women, men and children will be forced to move elsewhere. The dispossessed will include students, low-wage workers, elderly and disabled people, any others who cannot afford the skyrocketing costs of automobiles and are not physically strong enough to ride bikes nor desperate enough to risk their lives pedaling amongst road-raging motorists already infamous for their deadly hatred of bicyclists. Which is – or so I strongly suspect – precisely the compulsory exodus the local Ruling Class intends. 

Originally I intended to end this piece here, but then another poster on the Charles Pierce/Sen. Warren thread supposed I was too young to remember when the capitalists – terrified into a temporary false-humanitarianism by the Soviet Union and the socialist revolutions it represented and fostered even amidst its own huge failures – made sure “life was affordable.” Yes, I replied, I remembered that era very well, never mind the affordability was shared only by those who were male, heterosexual, Caucasian and/or not residents of some urban ghetto, rural shantytown, backwoods shack or First Nations reservation. Indeed, born in 1940 as I was, I lived at the apex of the so-called "American" Dream – the irony quotes demanded by the fact the Dream never much extended beyond the USian borders. Thus, thanks largely to my father, I was also educated in economic reality, which means I was taught to recognize capitalism as infinite greed elevated to maximum virtue (and therefore the closest approximation of Absolute Evil our species has yet evoked). I also learned to see the Dream for what it was: a capitalist Big Lie, the modern equivalent of the politically savvy Roman emperors' panem et circenses. Like the free bread and the spectacular events in the Coliseum and its myriad smaller-city counterparts, the Dream and its sequel the New Deal was intended only to opiate enough of the masses long enough to ensure the permanent brain-death of their revolutionary instincts. That's why – once the One Percenters had taken back all the power they lost during the halcyon years of Communism and socialism – the New Deal and the Dream itself were terminated forever, as was the so-called "American" experiment in constitutional governance. Now, with the capitalists once again free to be their innately savage Ayn Rand selves, it's back to business as usual: absolute power and unlimited profit for the Ruling Class, total subjugation for all the rest of us. 

LB/6 July 2013 

-30-