*
MOTHERHOOD
IS THE one human quality that knows no borders. It has neither racial
nor political identity. Its language is so wordlessly transcendent it is
truly universal – which gives a new and profoundly deeper meaning to
the notion of an original human Mother Tongue. Indeed, if matriarchy was
the first and most enduring social construct of our species – and I can
no longer doubt it – surely in the common exaltation of motherhood (and
ultimately therefore the honoring of femaleness whether fecund or not),
was the original solidarity that enabled our species' survival.
I
write these words astounded it has taken me nearly 74 years of life to
learn this lesson that is daily taught us by women everywhere. It is a
lesson that now, after I have finally learned it, seems so utterly
obvious I can only rail at my apparent stupidity. Observe any gathering
of women with children – especially one in which the women are of
diverse nationalities or castes or races – and almost invariably you
will witness how the common processes of motherhood quickly, often
literally within minutes, overcome all those barriers the males of our
species find insurmountable. It is as obvious as sunrise: for women with
children – and I have seen it more times than I can count – there is
almost invariably an organic unity of purpose so powerful its
participants need not consciously acknowledge it, a momentary state of
harmony and peace so deeply instinctive it seemingly has no peer in
human experience.
Oddly
enough, I am not sure when I first began observing this phenomenon.
Probably it was during my childhood, no doubt after the savage
dysfunction that shattered my family during my fifth year prompted me to
begin watchfully comparing my own notably abnormal circumstances as an
unwanted child to the seemingly normal circumstances of other obviously
beloved children. But that seems almost too glib, for on a deeper level
it often feels as if I have always recognized the solidarity of
motherhood as the sole human constant, the very quality of soul my own
birthmother so violently rejected, never mind that for nearly all other
women it is everywhere and every-when an ultimate form of immediate
sisterhood.
Even
so, for most of my life what I now think of as the Motherhood
International was scarcely more than part of the background, something I
noticed in the same way I might notice the advent of autumnal color or
the sudden presence of a neighbor's handsome new dog, significant enough
to prompt a momentary sharpening of focus but without any associated
analysis. But then a couple of years ago, as part of my ongoing effort
to find logical support for my growing conviction that patriarchy is a
fatal mistake and confirmation for my near-lifetime suspicion that
females are generally better people than males, I began closely
observing women and how they interact with one another. Of course I have
always observed women, but because I am a heterosexual male, most of my
years of observation were beclouded by lust and lustful purpose, so it
was not until I achieved the sexual neutrality of old age I was able to
see beyond the (exquisitely beautiful) intellectual and physical
sensualities of even the most allegedly “plain” women to the deeper
implications of femaleness itself.
Here
of course is one great advantage of the observational skills I acquired
as a journalist and photographer. But the irony of those talents is the
extent to which their application – mostly in official functions such
as the enactment of legislation or the formal interviews essential to
biographical reportage or investigative work – radically limited what I
could watch and therefore might see. A woman in a forcefully patriarchal
society – which the United States most assuredly is – must necessarily
adopt the defining male qualities of aggression and ruthlessness if she
is to achieve and maintain any sort of power or influence. Hence I spent
most of my professional life observing women trying to function within
the confines of a nation that is reduced to moral imbecility (if not
manifest evil) by its commitment to capitalism – infinite greed elevated
to ultimate virtue – and to capitalist governance: absolute power and
unlimited profit for the Ruling Class, total subjugation for everyone
else. What I typically saw was therefore scarcely representative of
womanhood per se.
My
first clear look at what might obtain beyond the confines of patriarchy
was in the context of the old Counterculture. Though mainstream-media
employment severely limited my ability to give myself wholly over to la vie boheme,
I nevertheless managed several sanity-preserving interludes away from
the world of deadlines and tweed-sportcoat conformity. Typically but not
always these de facto vacations were in association with the
alternative press. Hence I was able to observe a goodly number of womens
collectives, which were an organic and influential faction within the
Countercultural rebellion, particularly in the rural Pacific Northwest.
Those with which I came in more than merely superficial contact all
seemed possessed of a unity far more resilient than anything men alone
or even men and women together were able to achieve.
But
the real eye-opener came after my downfall, when the 1983 housefire
destroyed all my life's work and the definitively USian,
no-jobs-for-crazies odium of the subsequent clinical depression banished
me forever from any sort of journalism save part-time or freelance
work. Thus reduced to inescapable poverty, I spent (and spend) a
disproportionate amount of time in welfare offices and other such realms
of ruined lives, impossibly straited circumstances and irremediable
dispossession. And there for the first time I witnessed how the very
realities that had us men sitting as far apart from one another as
possible and invariably in sullenly silent, utterly alienated
mortification seemed to somehow free the women from the societal
restraints that might otherwise have kept them divided. I saw it
repeatedly: how women of diverse races and nationalities and even castes
(many of them by their clothing obviously the newly impoverished
victims of capitalism's most recent savageries), somehow as if by magic
set aside their differences enough to freely converse, often with
obvious empathy for one another, as each woman awaited the elaboration
of whatever bad news had summoned her to Misery Central, the harshly
lit, heartlessly managed offices of the Washington Department of Social
and Health Services. And whenever these women were accompanied by their
children, the sisterhood of motherhood – race and caste and nationality
be damned – became overwhelmingly apparent in mere minutes.
But
that beautiful and compelling solidarity of mothers was not just a
phenomenon of the welfare office. I witness it time and again on public
transport. First and long ago and before I realized what I was watching,
I had seen it on the Knoxville Transit Lines and Grand Rapids Coach
Company buses of my 1950s youth, women helping other women with children
regardless of race or apparent social status. I had seen it on the
subways of Manhattan and Brooklyn and on the Hudson Tubes and other rail
transport in New Jersey during the 1960s and again during the 1980s,
and in all probability had seen it as a child on the trains and trolleys
I rode with my parents in New York and lesser cities during the first
years of this lifetime. Now I see it regularly on crowded Tacoma buses:
women who are total strangers to one another, as in “here I can hold
your baby while you fold up that stroller,” a well-dressed young black
woman helping a shabbily dressed young white woman, the black woman
cooing to the white child as the white woman fights the perambulator
down and under the seat as required by transit regulations, then the
black woman handing the white child back to the white mother and the two
women now talking about babies and children as easily as if they were
sisters. I have seen as many as four young women – all strangers to one
another, two white, one Asian, one black, the Asian and one of the
whites barely able to speak English – collaborate to hold a tiny baby
and find a fallen-off perambulator part to solve a problem that became
obvious when the big pram which was fully laden with groceries and baby
gear collapsed just after the mother had lifted her baby out. The four
women worked together as if they had been teammates all their lives and
within minutes they had repaired the pram, and the Motherhood
International had triumphed once again.
That
I can tell this story is the beauty of regularly riding mass transit.
It enables you to witness every extreme of human behavior, from criminal
selfishness to selfless humanitarianism. In this sense it's the same in
Manhattan, where public transport is a civil right, as it is in Tacoma,
where the Ayn-Rand-minded electorate publicly denounces transit users
as parasites, damns mass transit itself as welfare and is maliciously
downsizing an already inadequate bus system in the hope of
socioeconomically cleansing the area of all the lower-income peoples who
make up more than half of its population but vote in disproportionately
small numbers because they believe, mostly correctly, that USian
elections will make no meaningful differences in their lives. Local
politics aside, there is probably no better or more thought-provoking
sociological vantage point than a city bus, trolley or subway car,
especially for a journalist whose inclinations run toward social
commentary. And it was on a Tacoma bus just yesterday again watching
with awe the international sisterhood of motherhood it came to me: first
that motherhood has no borders, next that only the solidarity of
motherhood is powerful enough to save our species from
self-extermination.
LB/17 November 2013
-30-