OAN: Some Thoughts on Content and Direction

I'VE RECOVERED FROM the frantic and painful preparation for last week's surprise apartment inspection – one of the punishments inflicted on seniors and disabled people impoverished enough to qualify for publicly funded housing. Nor was I amongst the unfortunate 20 percent whose dwellings were chosen at random for de facto warrantless searches by state bureaucrats. But the aftermath of the mandatory house-cleaning left me abed for a couple of days while the grade-6-to-7 arthritis pain in my back, shoulders and right knee dwindled to its omnipresent norm, typically a grade 2 on the 1-to-10 medical-discomfort scale.

Because my gender exempts me from the agony of childbirth, I have two grade-10 pain significators. One is the legacy of a tooth that in 1969 became simultaneously impacted and abscessed at the beginning of what turned into the longest four-day holiday-weekend in human history. The other is the (literally) bite-a-hole-in-my-pillow-to-keep-from-screaming interlude that followed a radical meniscectomy in 1978 – the removal of all the cartilage from my right knee. The anesthesia wore off quite suddenly, and all at once I hurt so badly, it took me several eternities to focus enough to invoke the Nurse-Angel of Narcotic Salvation, though once I found the magic buzzer, she immediately blessed me with a syringe full of morphine.

But all that is something of an aside. The point here is my two post-inspection-recovery days of what-do-I-wanna-be-when-I-grow-up contemplation was mostly spent pondering whether to take OAN daily or continue it as as a weekly. Given my age, in either case it will undoubtedly remain my final expression of a truth I have known since The Grand Rapids Herald hired me as a copyboy and sports stringer shortly before my 16th Christmas – that real journalism is a 24/7 way of life rather than a 35-hour-per-week job.

If I were to take OAN daily, it would mean posting material as events warrant and as frequently as my schedule permits. The idea was (and remains) powerfully attractive. But finally – with a bit of help from the I Ching (Wilhelm/Baynes translation, Princeton University Press: 1967) – I realized, somewhat bitterly I admit, I lack sufficient time, which is the prime requirement for daily blogging. Too many hours of my life are stolen by geriatric medical appointments and household-errands turned to day-long bus-odysseys because I can no longer afford an automobile but live in the most anti-mass-transit seaport in the entire anti-mass-transit United States.

Thus OAN will continue as before, its contents posted both here (thanks again to my benefactors at Typepad) and on my secondary website at Blogger.  Save for the fact I am going to spend more time covering local events – albeit always in a global context – its contents will be mostly unchanged. “In Case You Missed It: Outside Agitation Elsewhere” will present its anthologies of recommended reading, including my often-sarcastic comments of course. And OAN's weekly single-topic columns, written by myself or by an occasional guest author, will focus as always on personal perspectives about major issues:   

• USian warmongering and the One Percent's escalating efforts at global conquest;
• The intensifying class war and the increasing savagery of capitalism;
• The stealthy but relentless imposition of Christian theocracy on the USian homeland;
• The bipartisan Big Lies that protect the Obamacare profiteers and victimize the rest of us;
• The unprecedented surveillance that sustains Ayn Rand plutocracy – the newest form of fascism – by clamping high-tech slave-collars around all our necks;
• The shock-doctrine schemes of the One Percenters, who are leveraging terminal climate change into a neo-Nazi restructuring of human society, ensuring their survival by enslaving or exterminating everyone else;
• Other such topics as they arise.

As before, these columns will include examples of how, in an economy and political system based on exploitation and oppression, the personal is always political, just as, for the same reasons, the political is always personal. Here though I hope to make a subtle change in approach, focusing less on the reality of our abject powerlessness – which I think we are at last beginning to acknowledge – and more on overcoming the challenges we face merely to survive.

 

Such is life and death amongst the 99 Percent in the United States of America, the former “sweet land of liberty” that capitalist governance – absolute power and unlimited profit for the One Percent; total subjugation for all the rest of us – has transformed into the most unapologetically vicious nation in the industrial world.

******

In Case You Missed It: Outside Agitation Elsewhere

I seldom write about 9/11 simply because in my view there is nothing worthwhile to be said about this great atrocity unless one starts by acknowledging how it marks the end, forever, of constitutional governance in the United States. But I was intrigued by William Boardman's Reader Supported News piece, “Museum World Trade Center Evidence: No Plane Hit Pentagon?” And eventually I added my own remarks to its predictably contentious comment-thread:

What matters most about 9/11 is the use to which it has been put.

Just as the Reichstag Fire enabled Hitler to nullify the Weimar constitution and turn Germany into a Nazi dictatorship, so did 9/11 enable the One Percent and their political servants to nullify the U.S. Constitution and turn the United States into a plutocratic dictatorship.

In other words, just as the Reichstag Fire was the birth of the Third Reich, so was 9/11 the birth of the de facto Fourth Reich, the zero-tolerance global empire of the USian plutocracy.

Moreover, just as the truth of the Reichstag Fire is lost due to Nazi secrecy, so is the truth of 9/11 lost by USian secrecy. In either case, public knowledge of what truly happened will never be allowed.

But the debate is allowed because it serves two purposes. It distracts us from the use of 9/11 – the permanent nullification of our constitution (and our reduction to powerlessness thereby) – and it helps preserve the Big Lie of USian democracy.

Indeed, the fact the debate is tolerated tells us it can never unearth the truth. Were it otherwise, it would be suppressed as quickly and violently as the Occupy Movement was suppressed.

Given the influence of Nazi war criminals on the U.S. government after World War II, the Reichstag-Fire pattern is itself suggestive. So is the fact the Department of Homeland Security structurally duplicates the dread SS Reichssicherheitshauptamt.

***

My next comment on the thread was a response to a poster who seems to regard the quest for “9/11 truth” as the most important endeavor in human history:

While I surely agree “a great deal...has already come out,” the same can be said of the assassinations – JFK, Malcolm X, MLK, RFK – that were the gateway to the road that ended at 9/11.

Again taking the Reichstag Fire example, Soviet intelligence (and the worldwide Communist Party) knew the truth within hours – that the Nazis set the fire and framed the halfwitted Marinus van der Lubbe and the Communists for the crime – but the official German version was never refuted, even after the war.

Much the same is true of 9/11: no matter how much contrary evidence is ferreted out, the official version will remain unchanged until the USian Empire is no more – which, given the givens – will probably not occur until our species itself is extinct.

To believe otherwise is to be in denial about not only about our own powerlessness but about the absolute determination of those who oppress us.

 

***

Later I elaborated:

To paraphrase Thomas Paine, these are indeed times that try our souls, infinitely more so than in 1776, when we had a seemingly endless future, while today the core truth of our lives is that we live on a dying planet.

 

In this context I see my own duty as mandated by the genocidal malevolence of the One Percent, which is transforming the survival of the 99 Percent into revolutionary defiance. My obligation is to aid that survival as best I can -- never mind I'm a crippled, impoverished old man.

That's why I give several hours each week to 15 Now Tacoma, the purpose of which is to make workers' lives a bit less wretched. It's why I edit and produce two journals, a local tenants' newsletter and (this) internationally read blog.

 

For the record, since early 2005 I have assumed 9/11 was either a Reichstag-Fire re-run or was deliberately allowed to happen.

After all, Nazi war criminals were the primary tactical and strategic influence in the postwar USian Empire, and false-flag aggression – Google “Operation Himmler” (no quotes) – was a standard Nazi tactic.

Given the morally imbecilic nature of capitalism, such atrocities are inevitable – and the tyranny of capitalist governance leaves us powerless to avenge them.

Hence I do not waste my time on causes – like the hunt for 9/11 truth – that offer no hope of easing the fear and misery in which we 99 Percenters increasingly live.

******

Cynic though I am, I was nevertheless taken aback when Reuters reported the notoriously brutal Seattle Police were filing a federal lawsuit to uphold their alleged right to maximum brutality.   Thus my contribution to the comment thread of “Seattle Police File Federal Lawsuit Over 'Use of Force' Policy”:

The fact the Seattle cops would file such a lawsuit – in essence demanding the right to inflict unlimited police brutality and generally behave as an army of occupation in a conquered land – tends to confirm what I have long suspected:

That the national epidemic of police brutality is the product of of very explicit post-9/11 federal policy and directives.

 

The (obviously intentional) result is a homeland in which the sole function of the police is to serve and protect the One Percent by savaging all the rest of us, just as the (imperial) military serves and protects the One Percent in exactly the same murderous manner abroad.

More specifically, because all local police units have been federalized and federally militarized, the Seattle lawsuit is essentially an appeal up the chain of command for judicial support – rather like the president obtaining judicial support for his alleged right to issue imperial death warrants.

 

Indeed, to understand this lawsuit any other way is to be in denial about what the United States has become, no longer the "sweet land of liberty" but rather the de facto Fourth Reich.

******

Another of Robert Parry's superb reports on the Ukraine blaming “neocons” for President Obama's warmongering  provoked me to reluctantly criticize a journalist whose bravery is beyond reproach and whose reporting is flawless save for his apparent inability or unwillingness to acknowledge the unprecedented magnitude of the chief executive's self-protective deceptiveness.

 

Hence on the comment-thread of “How Neocons Constrain Obama's Message,” I penned the following rejoinder:

The only flaw in Mr. Parry's courageous reporting is his assumption President Obama is himself a victim of neocon conspiracies.

The truth, made obvious by the president's shape-shift from Obama the Orator to Barack the Betrayer, is that Barack Obama is ideologically a white Republican. His African/American heritage was never more than a prop by which the One Percent sought to bolster the Big Lie of U.S. “democracy.”

Indeed, apart from the color of his skin, Obama's implicitly fascist politics are indistinguishable from those of any other U.S. president, Republican or Democrat, for whom the One Percent has purchased the office since the coup of 22 November 1963.

But like President Johnson, whose clandestine purpose was obviously to provoke the Vietnam-related class-war that destroyed the New Deal Coalition and thereby thrust the nation permanently to the right, Obama too is obviously a dual-purpose president. That purpose is revealed by how domestic racists are parlaying his betrayals into re-segregationist bigotry that says minorities are untrustworthy.

Because minorities were the nation's only source of genuine radicalism, the suppression of their voices is another rightward thrust – this time all the way to a Fourth Reich of unabashed Ayn Rand fascism.

Thus do the One Percenters achieve the goal their fathers and grandfathers sought via the Bankers' Plot, which would have made the U.S. the leading partner in the Rome/Berlin/Tokyo axis.

 

***

As to (Mr. Parry's) often subtle but nevertheless implicitly apologetic portrayal of Barack the Betrayer as a victim of neocon manipulation, that unfortunate meme – probably the result of an understandable reluctance to admit the unprecedented magnitude of the president's deceptions – is evident throughout Mr. Parry's otherwise superb reporting.

 

Because I voted for Obama twice – the first time because I believed his Big Lie of “change we can believe in,” the second time because I was (just as the One Percent intended), terrified by the Romney-Ryan assault gun – I can surely understand the reluctance to acknowledge we are now ruled by a president who is truly more ill-intentioned, and infinitely more authoritarian, than Richard Milhous Nixon.

Indeed, Obama is undoubtedly the most brazenly dishonest and effectively tyrannical politician ever to inhabit the White House. Think “change we can believe in,” total surveillance, the war against undocumented immigrants and the relentless persecution of whistle-blowers.

And until we acknowledge Obama is indeed an obedient servant of the One Percent (and therefore a white Republican in disguise) – until we admit how he conned us and how it facilitates the permanent end of USian democracy – we will remain imprisoned in the very darkness Mr. Parry is otherwise working so diligently and courageously to overcome.

******

Carl Gibson, reporting for Reader Supported News, wrote a scathing denunciation of how capitalism has perverted the USian justice system – zero-tolerance prosecution of minorities, lifetime imprisonment for nonviolent offenders, perpetual above-the-law immunity and billion-dollar bonuses for the most malevolently greedy robber barons in human history. But in the end, “Our Fraudulent Two-Tiered Justice System” was just another call for reforms we now know will never be allowed, and I responded accordingly:

I was applauding Mr. Gibson's reportage, especially his description of the USian criminal injustice system as "two-tiered," which is absolutely correct.

 

But then I read his concluding paragraph and realized he is just another reformer – that his outrage is rendered meaningless by his deluded belief in the integrity of the USian electoral process and in the Big Lie of USian "democracy" in general.

Which, when you analyze his rhetoric, means he's blaming us – we the people – for oppression that was maliciously imposed on us by the One Percent and that under present conditions is hopelessly beyond our capability to abolish or even ameliorate.

That's because the oppression Mr. Gibson so rightfully deplores – absolute power and unlimited profit for the Ruling Class, total subjugation for all the rest of us – is endemic to capitalism. Indeed it is the quintessence of capitalism's inevitable transition to fascism. 

And until we recognize the true extent of our powerlessness – until we acknowledge that capitalism by its predatory nature deliberately and methodically renders the 99 Percent as powerless as the masses of Tsarist Russia were before the revolutions of 1917 – we will remain enslaved.

******

Another of Robert Parry's superb reports on the Ukraine Crisis describes how its outcome is seemingly a huge loss for U.S. interests. But on second thought, it seems to me “The State Department's Ukraine Fiasco” was written from the (clearly obsolete) perspective the U.S. wants world peace and socioeconomic stability – this opposed to the chaos that furthers the USian Empire's goals of maximum profiteering, shock-doctrine global conquest and endless war to kill off the 99 Percent and justify ever-more-tyrannical oppression in the homeland. Therefore:

Mr. Parry's closing statement is indisputably true – there is no way the Ukraine Crisis has served U.S. national interests – but only if "national interests" are defined as what we the people need for our wellbeing.

More to the point, the interests of the neocons are always antithetical to our own. That's because the neocons' interests are those of their One Percent masters, whose goals are maximum short-term profits rather than long-term political stability.

From this perspective it is apparent the Ukraine Crisis is serving the One Percent's interests exactly as intended. The increasing military tensions are already boosting profits for military industries, while the socioeconomic chaos in Ukraine itself provides yet another opportunity for the imposition of shock-doctrine capitalism, which – as under Pinochet in Chile – means absolute power and unlimited profit for the rulers, total subjugation for everyone else.

 

Moreover, the manufactured need for vastly increased U.S. military expenditures provides the One Percent and their servants in both parties with a perfect rationale for further slashing social services including Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security. Psychological preparation for these genocidal cutbacks is undoubtedly the purpose behind the otherwise inexplicable hate-Russia media campaign.

Such is the realpolitik of plutocracy – actually sociopathocracy (rule by moral imbeciles) – that defines today's United States.

***

In response to another poster's question, I wrote:

The “problem with Obama” is he is a white Republican in disguise, and now that he does not have to scam us into voting for him again, he is ever-more-defiantly revealing his true self.

(Yeah, I'm one of those useful idiots who voted for him twice. First time because I stupidly let myself be conned by his Big Lie of "change we can believe in," second time because the One Percent's Romney-Ryan assault-gun did just what it was intended to do and terrified me into voting for him again.)

***

And as I said to an anti-Parry poster on the same thread:

(For you to) liken the National Endowment for Democracy to Amnesty International is rather akin to likening Reinhard Heydrich to Albert Schweitzer. And that calls into question (your) entire analysis, particularly since the only Ukrianian "human rights" NED cares about are those of the One Percenters and their anointed oligarchs.

******

As if in follow-up to my own ongoing coverage of the war against mass transit in Pugetopolis,  the Olympia-Tacoma-Seattle-Bellingham metropolis on the eastern shore of Washington state's Puget Sound, Seattle's on-line daily Crosscut published a disheartening update of the worsening transit crisis.

 

For me, the usefulness of Bill Lucia's report, “No silver bullets among last ditch efforts to stave off bus service cuts,” extended beyond its factual content, which gave me a rare opportunity to contrast the (seemingly) humanitarian concerns of Seattle politicians with the Ayn-Rand/Marie-Antoinette attitudes of the politicians who rule Tacoma and Pierce County:

From the perspective of Tacoma – specifically its local politicians' chilly indifference to the ruinous impact of Pierce Transit's wrenching cutbacks on the transit-dependent urban population – the role of Seattle and King County politicians in the fight to preserve Metro Transit bus service is laudable and exemplary.

Indeed, until now, and with the notable exception of Kshama Sawant and her election to office, I never imagined I would find myself admiring anything about Seattle or any of its residents. That's because, to me, Seattlites will always be the most relentlessly vicious xenophobes I have ever encountered anywhere at any time. That includes my years in the South as an involuntary court-decreed school-year dependent of my father and stepmother, 1950-1956 and 1957-1958, then later, after three years of military service, as an outspokenly pro-civil-rights journalist, 1962-1965, including the summer of 1963 as a civil-rights activist.

Yes, the Ku Klux Klan tried to kill me – three times in fact – but other Southerners were faithful friends, and two Southerners were long-term lovers. By contrast, my four years in Seattle were the loneliest of my life; Seattleites were without exception relentlessly hostile, constantly damning me as “a fucking New York intellectual,” repeatedly telling me I should “go back where (I) belong,” and their vindictive Seattle-Freeze tactics, which included nasty notes, slashed tires, physical assault, the kidnapping of a dog and even defiant thefts of published and unpublished works, eventually ran me out of town.

 

I left Seattle in 1976, and I will never return. But I remained in the Pacific Northwest – the back-country trout fishing was too good to abandon – and now I must confess I have at last encountered one thing (apart from the election of Ms. Sawant) that is compellingly positive about Seattle. At least some of its politicians actually represent – or at least pretend to represent – the people like myself who can no longer afford automobiles and who are therefore utterly dependent on mass transit.

The irony, of course, is that fully half the population of Tacoma – where the politicians have never lifted so much as the proverbial finger to preserve Pierce Transit service – is officially lower income, and a substantial percentage, as I remember about 25 percent of the city's approximately 100,000 lower-income residents, have no other means of transportation. (The no-option-save-buses figure is deftly concealed by the local bureaucracy, but it is available via a bit of research, and I apologize for the fact I do not have time to ferret it out today.)

More to the point, the refusal of the local politicians to protect the bus service vital to our survival proves that, in Tacoma and Pierce County, we lower-income people have no political representation at all. Not only is there the politicians' total indifference to the consequences of PT downsizing. Now – as if to clear up any misunderstanding about whose side the politicians are on – these same politicos, Democrats and Republicans alike, have approved PT's shift to a new policy of penalizing pro-transit Tacomans by withholding intra-city service even as service to the (notably wealthier) anti-transit suburbs is radically expanded. The contempt and hatefulness in the message this new policy sends the urban poor is unmistakable.

Hence – much as it grieves me to admit it – for purposes of transit, and more generally for politicians who will at least publicly acknowledge the existence of lower-income people and the pressing reality of our needs, anyone who like myself is now a member of the urban underclass is probably better off living in Seattle.

Such was the output of a week in which – theoretically speaking – I had no time to write. I guess it's true: journalism is like organized crime – you never get to retire. And never want to, either...

LB/1 June 2014

-30-

How Hate-Mongering Wrecked an Urban Transit System

VOTER REJECTION OF a tiny tax increase that would have saved a local transit system in the second most populous county of Washington state exemplifies the grassroots venom that fuels the One Percent's campaign to destroy government services. And the bitterly contested election's dreadful aftermath provides a vivid portrait of the life-disrupting, potentially deadly consequences inflicted on the victims whenever the One Percenters win.

 

Fostered by a disturbingly Karl Rovish “transit is welfare” meme that mysteriously surfaced here in 2010, the defeat of Proposition 1 on the November 2012 ballot will downsize local bus service almost to nothing in Tacoma and surrounding Pierce County. It will impose a 53 percent cutback atop two other devastating contractions: the 35 percent reduction mandated by anti-transit voters last year and the previous eight percent decrease forced by declining tax revenues in 2010.

Even now, with its reduced-frequency buses uncomfortably overcrowded even by New York City standards, Pierce Transit carries an average of 35,737 boardings every weekday. But the pending cuts will strand tens of thousands of these passengers, denying them transportation to jobs, schools, medical appointments and other life-sustaining essentials.

Kate Whiting, who headed the Restore Transit Now campaign, says the loss is already inflicting the terrible anxiety of “an uncertain future” on anyone who lacks other transport options. Local social-service officials expect far more devastating consequences. They predict the termination of access to vital services will eventually be death-dealing, especially for elderly and disabled people.

In response, the gloating victors are “applauding, exalting, congratulating, cheering, celebrating and dancing,” ostensibly because they “beat back a tax increase funded by $125,000 of union money.”  But many of the remarks posted on related Internet threads suggest the real motive for the anti-transit vote is hatred and contempt for transit users and lower-income people in general.

The defeated measure would have added a mere three tenths of one percent – three pennies on a $10 purchase – to local retail sales taxes. Like all government agencies in anti-income-tax Washington state, Pierce Transit is funded mostly by these ad valorem taxes; the proposed increase would have compensated for the ongoing revenue loss inflicted by the economic collapse and the resultant decline in retail sales. Had Proposition 1 been approved, its minuscule tax increase would have restored bus and shuttle operations to the (barely adequate) levels that obtained prior to 2008.

Rejection of an identical tax proposal in February 2011 eliminated 11 bus routes, cut schedules on most other routes to one bus per hour and sharply curtailed PT's operations-day by ending most service at 9 p.m. Now, thanks to this year's anti-transit vote, all weekend buses and evening bus service after 7 p.m. will be terminated, probably in February 2013. Innumerable Saturday, Sunday and night-shift workers throughout the 292-square-mile PT service area will have no way to get to and from their jobs. Shuttle operations – the sole means of transport for 6,948 elderly and/or disabled people – will be abolished at the same time. Most likely – given the permanent end of the American Dream economy and the burgeoning anti-transit-rider venom in the suburbs – the shut-downs will be forever. 

Just as a PT commissioner warned before the election,  the radically reduced service – downsized by a total of 97 percent since 2009 – will impose an additional revenue loss so staggering it will almost certainly kill the entire system. The PT district population of 556,908 persons, 200,678 of whom live within the seaport city of Tacoma, would then be left without any local public transport.

Pierce County with its total population of 807,904 could thus become the largest metropolis in the industrial world without mass transit – probably the only such locale in history to have spawned an anti-transit-user movement so vengeful its contempt and hatred of lower-income people destroyed its entire transit system. The ensuing crisis and its resultant odium is sure to cripple the already wounded local economy.

The longer-term outcome – especially ironic given the anti-transit stance of the Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber of Commerce – is permanent entrapment of the local economy in the same sort of chronic depression that plagued the post-Civil-War, pre-Tennessee-Valley-Authority South. As RTN's Whiting noted, “a reliable public transportation system is a necessity for sustained economic development.” 

Though Proposition 1 passed by a 55 percent majority in Tacoma, it was rejected by 56 percent in the suburbs. The overall anti-transit majority was only 695 votes, but an additional 15,400 under votes – ballots cast by people too disdainful of transit and transit users to mark a preference – indicate the real anti-transit majority is much larger. This approaches an impossible-to-overcome 57 percent in the suburbs, which contain nearly two-thirds of the PT service district's population. The same mode of reckoning – adding Tacoma's under-votes to its “No” votes – reduces Tacoma's pro-transit majority to a barely dependable 53 percent.

In any case the damage is done. The Republicans have focused socioeconomic, racial and ethnic hatred into an anti-transit-user movement, and the anti-transit-user movement has prevailed, mobilizing its Ayn Rand malice into “a vote against human decency.” 

Transit advocates regard this “hate vote” as a new form of gentrification, its vindictive denial of public transport a not-so-subtle eviction notice to all transit-dependent people in the area. With about half Tacoma's total population officially classified as “lower income” – individuals earning no more than $2,793 per month, families of four earning no more than $5,763 per month – the city's poorer neighborhoods provide most of PT's total ridership. Forty-five percent of these riders, PT spokespersons say, have no working vehicle; 56 percent come from households with incomes less than $1,667 per month.

Never mind these figures and the devastation an anti-transit vote would inflict were repeatedly stressed by pre-election news coverage; in the hate-fueled political climate of the present-day United States, appeals to humanitarianism often backfire. Comments on the web site of The News Tribune, the local McClatchy daily, reveal the intensity of the anti-transit-user malice.

Each entry is printed here exactly as it appeared, misspellings, grammatical errors and all:

“You really believe that other people are responsible for supporting you and providing cheap transportation because you are too lazy to work for a living,” wrote gerry0416 in response to a transit supporter. 

“The transit system should be self supporting,” posted Mary Bishop Kellog. “Don't ask me to pay your bus fare.”

“Call a Cab,” said tommy98466. “This should be a private venture not a taxpayer funded operation.” 

“If living in Tacoma becomes life or death to pay there own way on the buss they can just pack up and move out,” wrote TerryTman.

Rage at municipal unions and spiteful envy of the pay and benefits for which union members have successfully struggled was also a big factor:

“Why is it Pierce Transit has to be fed by taxpayers? Let private sector take over it and I am sure it'll be cheaper and more effective service. Of course union will not allow it, because they are like leaches will not survive without supply,” said  Alisa Simson.

“Many of those who vote no,” said crusader, “are expressing their desire to end the quid pro quo that is politicians providing unsustainable compensation to public sector union who in turn donate and vote to perpetuate the cycle.” 

“Agreed 100% on starving the beast,” wrote taxedenoughintacoma. “I live it everyday. If everyone else did we would cripple the unions overnight. We MUST stop enabling the ponzi scheme that is the public sector unions and their bought and paid for political party, the democrats.” Elsewhere in the same thread taxedenough denounced unionism as “thuggery.”

With bus riders and Amalgamated Transit Union members so obviously despised by the suburban majority and the bus system itself therefore almost certainly doomed, it's legitimate to ask how such an atrocity could occur in a state so apparently “blue” – that is, reliably Democratic in its presidential, senatorial, gubernatorial and social-issues votes.

The short answer is Washington's electorate is bitterly divided between forward-looking, secular-minded urbanites and avowedly conservative, often fanatically Christian rural and suburban residents. By about 55 percent, the urbanites are the majority population, and their viewpoint is reflected accordingly in the state's notably “blue” politics.

Moreover the cities typically govern themselves with self-protective policies that sustain progressive values and relative enlightenment in environmental affairs, often extending these attitudes into the adjacent suburbs. 

But in Tacoma this tolerant and generous application of the basic principle of democratic governance – enabling people to do collectively what they cannot accomplish individually – has uniquely resulted in cataclysmic and probably irreversible failure. Tacoma's attempt to extend urban amenities beyond its city limits – the expansion of Tacoma Transit into Pierce Transit via Urban Mass Transit Administration grants in the late 1970s – has given the vindictively reactionary Pierce County suburbs the political power to literally destroy the city.

Because the suburbanites' notion of “the city” symbolizes everything they despise – socioeconomic, racial and gender equality; the paycheck democracy inherent in unions; racial and cultural diversity; sexual and reproductive freedom; every other aspect of progressive thinking – they are now mercilessly employing the deadliest weapon in their arsenal: killing mass transit and thereby killing the city itself.

Additional results from the November 2012 election reveal the true magnitude of the forces arrayed against Tacoma. Though President Obama won re-election statewide by 54 percentage points, the losing Republican presidential ticket won parts of suburban Pierce County by as much as a 70-30 margin. Republican Gubernatorial Candidate Rob McKenna, who lost statewide to Democrat Jay Inslee, carried the same general area by at least a 60-40 margin. Referendum 74, the marriage equality measure that passed statewide by a 55-47, was emphatically rejected by the county's suburbanites, again by as much as 30 percent. 

PT's probably-terminal defeat is also very much in keeping with the region's long ugly history of opposition to public transport, a modern trend that began in Seattle with the defeat of a regional transit proposal in 1968. That measure, labeled Forward Thrust, was denounced as a threat to “the Pacific Northwest lifestyle” and condemned as “Manhattanization.” A whisper campaign by bigots went even further, denouncing Forward Thrust as an effort to make the city another “Jew York.” Xenophobia and bigotry thus quickly trumped Seattle's self-proclaimed environmentalism, reducing it to scarcely more than a blatantly hypocritical lie. (This anti-transit background is further detailed in the “Editor's Pick” response I wrote last April to a transit report in Crosscut, the Seattle online daily, for which scroll down.) 

Though Seattle's hostility to mass transit has in recent years been partially neutralized by an influx of high-tech “outlanders” – the pejorative by which locally born Seattleites eternally damn anyone from elsewhere – the city's transit system is immeasurably behind that of its northern neighbor Vancouver B.C. and is at least 40 years behind that of its southern neighbor Portland, Oregon – gaps that post-American-Dream budget constraints have made permanently unbridgeable. Now the anti-transit pattern established by Seattle prevails throughout the region, with the rejection of at least 11 regional transit proposals since 1968.

In Pierce County the anti-transit forces parlayed all these factors into what is undoubtedly their most destructive victory yet. The “transit is welfare” meme afixed to public transport the same implications of race and socioeconomic status that made “crime” and “welfare” racist buzzwords during the final decades of the 20th Century. No matter PT's proposed tax hike was so small even a pauper could have afforded it, the Josef Goebbels psycholinguistic manipulation at which the Republicans have excelled at least since the Nixon years quickly turned a “Yes” vote into another form of the affirmative action the White Right regards as abject surrender to minorities they most despise.

That's why the anti-transit propaganda characterized the tax increase as doomsday made real: “Up to 10.1% Sales Tax? It's Too Much! Reject Prop 1.” The 2011 anti-transit slogan was similarly euphemistic: “Stop Wasting Tax Funds...It's Time To Take A Stand In Pierce County.” Curiously, the page on the party's website featuring the grossly misleading “10.1 sales tax” claim has since vanished, but the propaganda from last year remains: “Pierce Transit and the unions they support are waging a war against your wallet in what may be the most audacious tax grab of 2011.”

As pro-transit poster Zaqar notes on a long TNT thread already linked above,  “A racist subtext certainly underlies Pierce County opposition to the tax and many of the comments on this article – unless you think everybody has somehow failed to notice that the majority of people earning less than 20K per year, that is, the majority of people riding the bus, are not white.”

Dg54321's retort is a classic:  “And who's fault is that?  With affirmative action, there is no reason people of color cannot make as much money if not more than white people.  Enough of the "whitey is keeping me down" BS, cause it just doesn't fly in the year 2012.  A black man is in the Oval Office for crying out loud....what more do you people want?”

Remarks on 2011 threads were even more blatantly racist. “It's dangerous (to ride the bus),” said taxedenoughintacoma. “I don't ride uless (sic) I have my carry weapon. Go ride the bus and night and look at some of the people. You won't ride again. Too scary if you ask me.” 

“You want me to vote for the Transit,” asked WarmNfuzziOne, “when this is the primary means juvenile petty thieves and thugs become enabled with transportation to spread their behaviors beyond the hood? Ever wonder how much safer the Lakewood Town Center and Tacoma Mall would be without the Transit?”

Another racist comment has since been deleted from the same thread: “If this thing (is defeated), it will probably be comfortable to go to South Hill Mall once again. The last time I was there the place was chock-a-block full of hood-rat gangsta' wanna' be punkasses with more being delivered every ten minutes by Pierce Transit. The Mall employees told me they are an unmitigated negative, never spending a dime and spending their afternoon harassing the few customers they had not succeeded in running off.”

But is Pierce County's anti-transit-user movement – and a movement it surely is – a harbinger of things to come elsewhere in the suburban United States? Or is it merely another dying spasm of the Republican/Teabagger racial bigotry and socioeconomic hatred that swept the nation ​in response to the 2008 election of President Barack Obama?

That too is a legitimate question, particularly given the long-ago testimony by Watergate Felon John Ehrlichman, one of Disgraced President Richard Nixon's top henchmen, that Washington state is a favorite proving ground for the One Percent's techniques of oppression. Its relevance is underscored by the mystery of how the “transit is welfare” meme that was PT's downfall appeared seemingly from nowhere, its Carl Rove/Grover Norquist malignancy suggesting manipulative cunning far beyond the usual “Nuke Tehran/Kill Fags/Get a Job” utterances of the local reactionaries.

The best guess of the more savvy transit advocates is it was introduced by national Republican operatives, the political equivalent of a marketing test. If this is true – if the ruin inflicted by the Pierce County anti-transit-user movement is the first battle in a nationwide Republican war on mass transit – it bodes ill for the users of every U.S. public transport system outside the Boston-New York City-Washington D.C. Corridor, the only region in the entire nation where public transport is considered a civil right.

Given these givens, is there any possibility of saving the Tacoma portion of the bus service?
 

Tacoma Mayor Marilyn Strickland, who also chairs the PT Board of Commissioners, is noncommittal. Briefly interviewed after a 20 November city council meeting, she reluctantly acknowledged Tacoma's newly created Public Transportation Benefit District could indeed provide the legal framework for creation of a Tacoma-only bus system. But the PTBD, she said, was established for emergency repairs of streets and sidewalks. It has only a $3.5 million budget, she added, with no plans to expand into the realm of mass transit.

ATU Local 758 President Don McKnight said he doesn't know whether or how Tacoma's bus service might be preserved. “At this point,” he said, “it's been made clear that everything is on the table.”

Another unknown is how the end of PT bus service will affect the commuter trains and express buses provided by Sound Transit, the Seattle-based regional transit authority that serves a three-county area from Tacoma north through Seattle to Everett, another Puget Sound seaport city. ST, which autocentric suburbanites bitterly criticize for its refusal to squander money building giant parking lots, depends heavily on local buses to ferry passengers to and from its railroad stations and bus terminals.

Transit advocates thus rationally fear the loss of local bus service will prompt ST to discontinue the trains and express buses that serve Tacoma and its immediate environs. Given the strength of anti-transit sentiment in the Pierce County suburbs, they say it's possible ST will even shut down the popular trolley it operates in downtown Tacoma, part of a light rail system that was to be expanded within Tacoma and eventually extended to link the city with SeaTac International Airport and Seattle itself.

But Pierce County suburbanites killed those projects too, voting against regional transit proposals in 2007 and 2008. Hence the probability is the proposed ST expansions will never be built. Indeed the trolley itself may be shut down. 

Meanwhile, the victims of the Pierce Transit cutbacks – students, low-wage workers, PT employees whose jobs will be lost, anyone who is elderly or disabled – now live in post-election dread.

“It is already difficult to get to use this system,” wrote MFM008 on another TNT  thread about the looming shutdown.  “I am disabled and without this some people could die. How do kidney dialysis patients get to appointments 3 times a week?  This isnt just to get to jobs or shopping. I cant drive because of my eyes, my moms are worse- she uses pierce transit. What do you do when this is all you have? suggestions? Die?”

Said Tomwa007 in a typically heartless response: “You better move to downtown Tacoma with service if you can not afford private transport. That is how it works, get used to it.”

LB/24 November 2012

-30-

Election 2012: Local Hatefulness Kills State, National Joy

THOUGH THERE WAS was much to celebrate in the results of the 6 November balloting – especially the senatorial triumph of a woman who genuinely terrifies the One Percent – it was nevertheless the worst election night of my life: dread and circuses, with dread winning by a landslide. 

That's because the voters of this Ayn Rand backwater to which I was long ago exiled by the gentrification of Manhattan are again using their ballots to sneer “Fuck You” at anyone who's dependent on public transport.

Not that I am surprised. Those of us who are transit riders, pedestrians and bicyclists have long been openly despised by a substantial majority of the wealthier suburbanites here, and now possibly we are being targeted by a majority even within the city limits of Tacoma.

It would not be incorrect to label this bigotry a movement – the Anti-Transit-User-Movement. Its well-financed hatefulness has coalesced into cultoid deification of automobiles and pickup trucks as ultimate symbols of “Americanism” and “the Pacific Northwest Lifestyle”: it is literally a car cult, as unique to the Puget Sound region as the cargo cults were to remote South Pacific islands.

Its disciples fume against bicycles, trains and buses as proofs of conspiracy against their imaginary “right to drive” – in ugly reality their self-obsessed, morally imbecilic compulsion to isolate themselves in mechanized armor and mercilessly bully anyone who is not similarly equipped. 

The car cultists are road rage personified. They demonstrate their autocentric hatred by refusing to slow their vehicles for bicyclists or yield the right-of-way to obviously disabled people in crosswalks; they spew invective – “get a job, you lazy bum” – at those of us waiting at bus stops; most of all they flock to the polls at every opportunity to vote against transit and thereby continue their relentless assault against transit-users. 

And yes it is that personal – as personal as a fist in the face. The insurmountable hardships these anti-bus-rider voters will gleefully inflict on me if they're successful – the lethal misery they will happily impose on anyone whose circumstances are similar to my own – robbed the election of all the joy it would otherwise have evoked. 

Make no mistake: I applaud the victory of President Barack Obama, which – or so I desperately hope – has slowed the Ruling Class effort to impose a new form of Nazism on the United States. I am delighted the voters of Washington have apparently elected Jay Inslee governor – and have thereby beaten back the One Percent's attempt to turn this state into another Wisconsin. 

I am pleased these same voters have endorsed marriage equality and legalized possession of marijuana, the latter a defiant protest against the federal government's sadistically punitive, implicitly racist War on Drug Users. 

Above all else I cheer the election of Elizabeth Warren, the new senator from Massachusetts whose victory pledge – “I won't just be your senator, I'll be your champion” – promises a potentially revolutionary revitalization of the entire Democratic Party. (Perhaps that explains why slightly more than half her speech, including the pledge itself, is now being suppressed by the corporate news monopolies.) 

Warren's apparent fragility paradoxically emphasizes her indomitable strength, a purely female manifestation of the emotionally compelling leadership traits that prompt soldiers to follow a commander through a harrowing of hell. Her proven courage and brilliance combine with her unapologetic womanliness to demonstrate a kind of magnetism and power that has remained relatively unknown in the adamantly patriarchal United States. But in truth it is ageless – witness the examples of Maeve in Celtic mythology and Boudicca in classical history. 

Not only do I cheer the senator-elect. Verily, I salute her as well. 

Indeed there is a quality of trustworthiness about Warren the like of which I have not sensed in a politician since the halcyon days of John Fitzgerald Kennedy and his brother Robert. That's why I believe she could become not just the new voice of a Democratic renaissance but the leader and conscience of an all-woman congressional insurgency that might actually free the party from its Wall Street captivity and restore the principles of the New Deal.

Admittedly that may be no more than the oft-disappointed yearning of a man who even in old age has never quite abandoned his conviction the Women's Movement would at last force this nation to be true to its stated principles of liberty and justice for all, much as my late father believed of the African-American Civil Rights Movement. 

Though it may be a lot more than that. Ultimately it feels like another reliable prompting of journalistic intuition – the first real, instinctive, from-the-bottom-of-my-heart political hopefulness I have felt in years. 

But on election night Warren's bright and blessed promise was ultimately meaningless – a phenomenon far away on the homeland coast from which I was long ago economically banished. 

Here in real-time Tacoma the Anti-Transit-User Movement was proving the town and its surrounding Pierce County to be perfect examples of Moron Nation – my name for the USian worst, the most pridefully ignorant, venomously conformist, vindictively anti-intellectual, maliciously bigoted citizenry in the industrial world.

It was a realization all the more painful because I used to love Tacoma. There was a time, 34 years ago, when Tacoma was genuinely more cosmopolitan than Seattle, particularly in the welcome its people extended to “outlanders” like myself. But now the probable outcome of the transit fight was legitimately resurrecting the question once asked by a brazenly snooty Seattle tee shirt: “If God is on our side, why is there a Tacoma?” 

Tacoma's vote is part of the Pierce County vote, and Pierce Countians were not only voting 51-49 to destroy the local transit system they had already ravaged at the polls in March 2011. Now in 2012 with Inslee headed for apparent victory, Pierce County was voting 52-48 for Rob McKenna, the homophobic, anti-health-reform, anti-Medicaid Republican attorney general who real Democrats feared was scheming to be another Scott Walker. And now, though marriage equality had won statewide, the locals were voting against it, 53-74 to withhold full citizenship from gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people. 

Because of Washington's absolutely reliable but painfully slow method of counting votes, the tabulations will continue for nearly another week.

If McKenna wins, Pierce County's closet-fascist voters can congratulate themselves. They will have made the difference between Washington remaining an officially progressive state or threatening – via gubernatorial powers of decree and paralysis-by-veto – to become another anti-labor, anti-woman, anti-gay Wisconsin. Likewise, had gay marriage lost, Pierce County could have lauded itself as the locale that swung the knockout punch of religious fanaticism against the LGBT community's yearnings for equality. 

As a Tacoma-born colleague of mine pointed out in the context of a gay-bashing incident several years ago, what else can you expect from the town that has more churches and church-going zealots than any other municipality in the state? 

But Tacoma and Pierce County also have the largest per-capita labor union membership in the state, which makes their citizens' calculated brutality toward transit-users all the more astonishing. It is a malevolence so intense the ballots have become like bullets – volleys to savage anyone who can't afford an automobile. 

Once again, brandishing as they did in 2011 the Moron Nation shibboleth that “transit is welfare” (the corollary of which is “let's kill the bums by shutting down their transportation”), the Anti-Transit-User Movement was vetoing a last-ditch, save-our-system measure proposed by the agency that operates the local bus service. 

Pierce Transit, as it's called, had asked voters to choose between two alternatives.

One is a tiny, three-tenths-of-one-percent sales-tax increase – that's three pennies on a $10 purchase – a sum even a pauper could afford. 

The other is a 53 percent cutback in bus service: no service on weekends; no service after seven p.m. on weekdays; service on the few surviving routes reduced mostly to one bus per hour – utter devastation dealt those of us who depend on public transport.

Because the vote counts continue, it's logical to wonder if there's any chance for a last-minute reversal in the results. I asked two well-positioned sources that very question. Neither answered. 

In other words, the Anti-Transit-User Movement of Tacoma and Pierce County has almost certainly won again – not really a surprise since its voters have rejected every other such proposal, whether from Pierce Transit or its Seattle-based regional counterpart Sound Transit, at least as far back as the middle '90s. 

Even if by some miracle we pro-transit people manage to eke out a winning margin, our enemies – and enemies is precisely what they are – already threaten a Florida-type recount fiasco that could delay the decision for weeks if not months. Clearly their hatred knows no limit; seemingly, neither do the bank accounts of their financiers. 

Nor is this unusual. The entire Puget Sound region has a uniquely anti-transit history that dates to 1968, when Seattle's first effort to build a regional light-rail system was easily defeated by a breathtakingly nasty campaign built around the assertion, never publicly proclaimed but often whispered, that “we don' wanna be like 'Jew' York.” Impossible to trace, it was apparently spawned by a faction of the One Percent that regarded adequate mass transit as a threat to its hegemony – an invitation to “undesirables” who might challenge local sweatshops and question the exclusionary privileges that make much of Western Washington a private country club for the super-rich. 

Three more decades of xenophobic no-transit votes reduced the population's smugly arrogant claims of environmental superiority to undeniable proof of a hypocrisy so huge its only counterpart in U.S. political history is the fossil-fuel industry's Big Lie efforts to persuade us it's not Mother Nature's deadliest adversary.

Only in recent years has a huge influx of high-tech “outlanders” nullified Seattle's indigenous hostility to public-transport users. Compared to transit systems in other Pacific Northwest coastal cities, Portland to the south and Vancouver in Canada, Seattle mass transit runs at least four decades behind – deliberately kept so backward it cannot possibly catch up – an urban-area outrage even in the notoriously autocentric United States. 

Now, as if in a race toward a new bottom, the Anti-Transit-User Movement of Tacoma and Pierce County is bidding to make its own bailiwick many times worse. What nobody in authority wants to admit is that downsizing of the magnitude being inflicted by ATUM voters will almost certainly mean the death of Pierce Transit. Nearly a fifth of its operating revenues come from the fare box. A service reduction of 53 percent will slash fare-box income to the proverbial bone, most likely enough to bankrupt the agency and shut it down permanently.

One knowledgeable transport-industry source says Tacoma/Pierce County thus will have brought upon itself the odium of being the largest urban area in the industrial world without public transportation. Thus too will it become a monument to greed, bigotry and miserliness, a nadir of anti-transit-user malice. Endorsed as the ATUM is by the Tacoma-Pierce County Chamber of Commerce and a deep-pocket coalition of local automobile dealers, it is already attracting the most negative sorts of international attention. 

Clearly, its alliance with the rabidly Teabaggerish ATUM severely limits the chamber's ability to fulfill one of its primary responsibilities – promoting Tacoma/Pierce County as a forward-looking place in which to headquarter, expand or build business and industry. 

Presumably the chamber represents all local business interests, but its emergence as a leader in the war against mass transit users suggests a much narrower (hidden) agenda. Has the chamber deliberately made itself an instrument in the One Percent's lethal subjugation of lower-income people? Is there some secret cabal of obscenely wealthy speculators eagerly awaiting the last run of the last Pierce Transit bus? Do they intend – once the transit agency is slain – to launch a for-profit bus company? 

No doubt such service would be priced to exclude all save the richest commuters – the aggressively Caucasian autocentrics who loudly decry the area's ever-more-gridlocked highways even as their votes against transit make the traffic that much worse. 

Why then do they vote as they do? 

Only a boundless aversion to the implicit democracy of public transport – a bottomless loathing and contempt for racial and ethnic minorities and the urban poor in general – could prompt such self-contradictory voting. With Pierce Transit slain and a for-profit bus company operating on the commuter routes, the wealthy suburbanites – and let us not forget Tacoma's growing number of penthouse urbanites – would finally have their own de facto limousine service. 

Plausible? You be the judge. But as we all know, privatization is almost always the ugly motive behind the deliberate downsizing and destruction of government services.

Perhaps some securely employed investigative reporter – if indeed any remain – will wrangle an assignment to explore these questions in depth. 

Meanwhile there's no doubt the attack on Tacoma/Pierce County bus riders is class war of the most vicious sort. Those of us who are elderly, disabled, chronically impoverished and therefore dependent on public transport for medical appointments, grocery shopping and other life-sustaining errands are being handed the Ayn Rand version of a termination notice: "we don't want you here; hurry up and die." 

LB/7-8 November 2012

-30-