23 November 2025

Suppressed History: 1967 Memorial Day Police Riot

Memorial Day Is About Remembrance, but the
Atrocities of 30 May 1967 in New York City Are a                Memorial Day the Ruling Class Would Have Us Forget.
 
 

Reprinted from the 29 May 2011 edition of Dispatches from Dystopia
(with minor revisions and an important update, below), this because
Dispatches was slain and its contents destroyed by the death of its server. 

A GROUP OF young men and women – some of them professional musicians with a performance permit issued by the City of New York – were first illegally rousted, then attacked by NYPD riot cops for the “crime” of making music in Tompkins Square Park, on Manhattan's Lower East Side.

The episode was so outrageous I convinced Walter Bowart – founding editor of The East Village Other, (the newspaper of the neighborhood's then-burgeoning community of artists and bohemians), to put out an extra, which is where – along with a half-dozen images by other photographers – the riot photos below first appeared.

Walter then acted as an ad hoc agent for all of us who had contributed pictures; the topmost was published in Newsweek and, according to him (he paid me but never managed to get me the tear-sheet), in Paris-Match as well.

I was in the park that day by accident – filmmaker Ron Schade had asked me to photograph him and his wife Joanie at play with their son Jason – and I had only one camera with me,  my IIIg Leica with its 50mm f/2 Summicron and most likely loaded with Panatomic X. My wife-to-be Adrienne, art student who always enjoyed watching me work and often made useful suggestions, was with us.

But when I saw the confrontation developing, I sent Adrienne running back to our East 5th Street apartment instructed to “bring me every 35mm camera body, every lens and every roll of Tri-X you can find.” (I normally kept as many as 20 36-exposure rolls of that film in our refrigerator.)

Adrienne did as requested. I thanked her, hugged and kissed her, tried to reassure her I'd be ok, hugged and kissed her again, handed her the Leica that was too slow to rewind to be useful for covering the violence I knew was coming,  then said “now get the hell out of here while you still can” and sent her home.

I watched to make sure she got safely out of the park. Forty-four years later I still remember her reluctance to leave and how she repeatedly glanced back over her shoulder as she walked away, her green eyes huge with concern – Adrienne a slender blonde who like a smaller Veruschka moved with the leggy grace of a danseuse – her long hair bright as pale fire in the surprise gloom of an afternoon suddenly beclouded, as if Nature were hiding her face from the atrocity that was about to obtain.

Then I clipped my Working Press badge to my jacket lapel and – now thanks to Adrienne properly equipped with two VT Canons, lever-drive, screw-mount rangefinder cameras, one with a 35mm f/2 Leitz Summicron, the other with an 85mm f/1.9 Canon, plus a Pentax H1A SLR mounting a Spiratone f/2.8 135mm; probably a dozen rolls of Tri-X in my pockets) – I loaded the cameras and began shooting film. 

At least 40 people were arrested that day. A pregnant woman and three men were hospitalized as a result of beatings inflicted by the NYPD's Tactical Police Force (the acronym for which, TPF, was ever after said to mean “Tasmanian Pig Fuckers”). Many of those arrested remained in jail for several days – the infamous Tombs for men, the even more infamous House of Detention aka “House of D” for women – while the Jade Companions of the Flower Dance, the neighborhood association for Lower East Side hippies and other bohemians, worked overtime to raise bail money.

Then as now, poverty was itself a crime – in the eyes of the Ruling Class an offense perhaps even more heinous than chanting the Hare Krishna and making other sorts of peaceful music on a day of war memorials.

Alas the incident has been disappeared down the Orwell hole: as I discovered when I returned to the City during the '80s, the EVO extra has been carefully snipped from the New York City Public Library's microfiche file – which means the censorship was official, imposed by a librarian acting on Ruling Class orders.  And of course in my case there was also the fire. But because I had a copy of that extra in my portfolio case, I now own what is undoubtedly the only extant copy. 

But ah the Jade Companions of the Flower Dance: how could such an exquisite name be lost to time and oppression and puritanical malevolence?

Say it aloud: Jade Companions of the Flower Dance.

Even now the words resonate with forbidden sensuality and resurrected sensibility, the lost rhythms of which we are reminded by Minoan frescoes and echoes of forgotten music, harps and flutes and drums, the choreography of women free enough to arch their backs and swirl their unbound hair, of men bold enough to join her – the Counterculture's breathtaking ghost-image remembrance of the once-was when God was a Woman and its implicit glimpses of what might have been and yes its premonitions of what might yet be. -- LB/29 May 2011 



  

   

Photographs by Loren Bliss copyright 1967, 2011, 2022, 2025
********* 
ADDENDUM 11 JULY 2024 (expanded 23 November 2025): The cover of EVO's government-suppressed Extra and my contributions to its photographic content have been thoughtfully resurrected by Scott Orr, the Paris-based publisher of B Scene Zine, in that art magazine's Volume 1, Issue 9 (August 2022), copies of which are for sale at bscenezine@gmail.com. My deepest thanks to Mr. Orr for this welcome blow against censorship, particularly given that the photographs he published were among the very few escapees of the 1 September 1983 arson that destroyed all my life's significant work.

My photograph of the sad-eyed woman below was the image on that issue’s cover but had no chronological connection to the Tompkins Park police  riot. It began its journalistic life as the lead picture on a story about an abysmally  failed 1971 anti-Vietnam-War demonstration and probably was freelanced to United Press International. But the emotion it expresses  is thematically perfect in its present role, and I applaud Mr. Orr’s perceptive choice. Meanwhile the riot itself has authoritatively been connected to the organizational prelude of the Central Intelligence Agency’s infamous Operation Chaos, its clandestine effort to destroy the entire Counterculture.* Given that I could recognize the Counterculture as I did (explanation follows) -- so could the Ivy-League-educated aristocrats the Agency hires as its analysts. See https://www.maebrussell.com/Mae%20Brussell%20Articles/Operation%20Chaos.html -- and, en passant,  recognize therein yet more irrefutable proof Trump is neither accident nor anomaly.

Photograph by Loren Bliss copyright 1971, 2022, 2025

All the images herein were archivally processed and selenium toned c. 1967-1974 and still look as good as new because I printed them on on the best, highest-silver-content photographic paper ever made, the late and still lamented DuPont Varilure, which tragically was discontinued forever in 1973 by the skyrocketing cost of silver triggered by the Arab Oil Embargo. These photos survived the fire only because they were amongst the three dozen matted exhibition prints in my portfolio case, which I had with me the night of the fire. But the arson-destroyed nearly all my photography, hundreds of prints and contact sheets from thousands of negatives dating to my first camera, given me by my father in 1952. It burned all my award certificates; most of the contents of my clip books; nearly all my photographic tear sheets; all but five volumes of the annual journal I began keeping in 1956, and all my unpublished writing. What little was saved – including hundreds of negatives that raised my hopes but proved to be too scorched or otherwise too fire-and-water damaged to print – was dug out of the rubble a year later.

By far the most devastating loss was "Glimpses of a Pale Dancer," a work-in-progress that argued the Counterculture was not the spoiled-youth tantrum our masters wanted us to believe, but was instead the first wave of a spontaneous, potentially global revolution against patriarchy. The product of 24 years of reportorial investigation that consumed most of my days-off, weekends and vacations, it so impressed the late Cicely Nichols, the New York City book editor promised to mother it to major publication much as she had parented Sisterhood Is Powerful (Random House: 1970). But the arsonist(s) destroyed all my research notes, all of the approximately 150-thousand words of extensively footnoted “Dancer” text and all but 10 of its approximately 100 pre-selected photographs in a blaze lit at the exact moment Cicely and I met in the Lions Head to finalize and celebrate our working agreement. Our anything-for-capitalism-no-matter-how-Evil government in action? Message received loud and clear.

The emotional shock of the fire -- specifically its nightmare obliteration of a consciousness that blended journalism and progressive activism into a life of great expectations, all of my potential reduced in an indescribably wrenching instant to inescapably wretched, permanently non-productive existence – flung me into post-traumatic depression, just as I’m certain was intended. At age 43, especially without my four filing-cabinet drawers of research notes, there is no possible way to reconstruct 24 years of work, and the realization I now had no more prospects than the Bowery bum featured in the January 1967 image below --  ironically long a mainstay of my working portfolio -- was literally overwhelming. (To potential clients, I typically described it as "a fortuitous grab" in my documentary efforts on the Lower East Side; to my political comrades I admitted what it actually was, an un-posed picture, yes, but nevertheless my best-ever photographic icon  of capitalist reality.)  
 
 Photograph by Loren Bliss copyright 1967, 1971, 2025

It took me so long to recover from the post-traumatic depression that predictably followed the loss of all my life’s efforts, it forced me onto welfare in 1988, which mandates typically anti-male bureaucratic supervision of any subsequent quest for productive employment. The resultant odium excluded me forever from the newspaper and magazine staff jobs that had been my lifeblood since my 16th year, reducing my professional efforts to occasional, woefully underpaid freelancing in a dwindling market. When I protested the bureaucrats' opportunity-killing involvement in my quest for work and threatened a lawsuit against their repeated, brazenly anti-male refusals to refer me to appropriate employers, the always-tyrannical bureaucrats – the era's real “welfare queens -- arbitrarily and contrary to the advice of their own bureaucrat-psychologists proclaimed me “unemployable”and in 1990 forced me onto Social Security as a permanently disabled person. Though no longer depressed and now officially retired -- I shed the always-hurtful stigma of “disabled welfare bum” in 2005 -- I disclose these  facts for three reasons:  
  • firstly to exemplify how disabled people on welfare are undoubtedly the most scorned and despised demographic in this realm, which is today, post-Nazi-Germany, by far our species’ most incorrigibly self-destructive Hatefully Christian Nation;
  • secondly to exemplify the operational meaning of the infinitely damning numbers I discovered in my investigative reporter’s swan song, a briefly Internet-published and quickly suppressed 1995 freelance expose´ that from 1970 through 1990, our federal, state and local welfare bureaucrats nationally increased their salaries and other administrative costs by 5,390 percent – say again 5,390 (not a typo) percent – even as they slashed stipends and services to impoverished and/or disabled persons by 66 percent;
  • lastly, to point out that this (mostly unreported) financial treachery is yet another of the key factors that prompted so many (politically ignorant) members of the 99.9 Percent to embrace Trump and his Deciders and the terminally ecogenocidal apocalypse they may yet inflict on ourselves, our fellow living creatures and our Mother Earth.
Meanwhile I thank fate for granting me total dispensation from any from concern the above disclosures might besmirch my reputation. The reduction to total and irreversible socioeconomic nonpersonhood inflicted by the fire damned me to spend the remainder of my years permanently deprived of any possibility of romantic love – another example of our Christian Nation in action**  – the realization of which admittedly embittering truth prompted me to long ago cease caring what anyone apart from a few former professional colleagues might think of me. That indifference and how it facilitates the unhesitating disclosure of personal truth is radically intensified by the fact I was officially declared terminally ill on 27 August 2024, this after a bout with Covid in June and July of 2023 – never mind I was fully vaccinated – that severely damaged my heart. Now I'm living on the proverbial borrowed time. Though I’m not the least afraid of death – indeed I will welcome it as an escape from the Auschwitz Nation with which Trump and his Deciders are replacing our failed Republic – I’m also in no hurry to leave. In fact the tiny part I am able to play in the Resistance has energized me as I have not been energized since the night of 1 September 1983, when -- unaware someone was already reducing my entire raisin-de-vie to naught but smoke and ash – Cicely and I were oh-so-naively celebrating the anticipated completion and publication of “Dancer” with dinner, drinks and mutually triumphant joy. 
__________________ 
*A credible report I encountered by accident three or four years ago reported the CIA involvement in the riot. Regretfully I do not remember the source,  and the link I bookmarked at the time was lost forever when Firefox radically shrunk and revised my bookmarks in 2023 with an infuriating intrusion they described as a routine update. Therefore I've extensively searched the Internet for it -- time spent 14.5 hours over two days -- but had no success. What I do remember is the article stated that the captain who temporarily replaced  Capt. Joe Fink -- the nominal commander of NYPD's Ninth Precinct, which includes Tompkins Park -- had CIA connections. The report suggested he was put in place to enable the riot, which was then provoked on CIA command by some of the neighborhood's Ukrainian Nazis,  war criminals to whom the U.S. was giving sanctuary from Soviet prosecution. (These are the people who are in the background in the lower two of the above photos; in both images they are cheering the cops.)  The report also said that the CIA's provocation of the riot was a prelude to its war against the Counterculture, Operation CHAOS, which officially began in August of 1967. I will keep searching, and if I can find it, I'll of course post the link here. Meanwhile, my apology; obviously, the fact I despise book-keeping and am thus a truly awful clerk has again bitten me on my backside.  
 
**It occurs to me I should make it clear that unlike the so-called INCELs -- all of whom are dangerously, incorrigibly hateful (their violent misogyny reinforced by political ignorance, self-delusion or both) --  I do not blame women for my post-fire unattractiveness. I am neither naive nor obtuse; I know an aging male with dwindling prospects, barely enough income to keep a roof over his head and no possibility of socioeconomic stability (much less any hope of socioeconomic improvement), is by definition objectively repugnant as far as romantic potential is concerned. Painfully depressing as it was,  I accepted that fact -- like inescapable poverty itself --  as one of the irremediable conditions inflicted by the fire and its destruction of my career at an age and income-level that made its replacement impossible.  Thus in recompense, from October 1986 through July 2004, I focused my consciousness on the anti-depressant, sanity-reinforcing gifts of close companionship with large, intelligent dogs; the fulfillment garnered by photographing and writing even solely for myself;  and on the quietly exquisite pleasures offered by our Mother Earth: union with nature via the constant interactions of deeply rural living, among them the meditations implicit in splitting firewood and subsistence gardening, growing all my own vegetables and often supplementing them by trout fishing and grouse hunting. And now, terminally ill, writing this postscript in 2025 -- 21 years after deceitful kin evicted me from what I assumed was my permanent back-country home and forced me into urban senior housing -- I find in reviewing my post-fire years, I have absolutely no regrets;  thanks to those named below, what grew from the post-1983 ashes and sprouted from the 2004 betrayal was far better than anything I initially imagined possible in either instance Thank you,  LeeRoy (half Rottweiler/half Golden retriever); thank you, Sadie (half Newfoundland/half Labrador); and thank you Brady (half Brittany/half Springer, and the best grouse dog ever). Blessed be, my intellectual and spiritual parents, my father the late Donald Read Bliss and my aunt the late Alecia Fuller Durand, and thank you for the ageless, priceless wisdom into which you raised me. Thank you for true friendship in my post-fire years,  Rebecca Valrejean,  Helen Farias,  Katelyn  Driskill and Brie Sweaney. Thank you for your supportiveness,  Jill Mohr, Valerie Friedline and Sharen Ahrens. Thank you,  Jim and Mary Plante, for more long-term, reliably faithful friendship than I could ever have  anticipated. Most of all, thank you, Goddess, for all of these life-sustaining gifts; may I serve you better in any lives to come.                     
 
-30-

22 October 2025

Abutments: an Encounter in the Northern Michigan Woods

(Asked how I -- outspokenly Marxian and assertively agnostic -- can also be a Gaian Pagan, I answer that Paganism chose me, and did so in a way that sustains the revolutionary skepticism in which I was raised. What follows is the true and eerie story of how that choosing happened. It is reprinted from Dispatches from Dystopia, which was slain and purged by its server's death.)   

*****

I BEGAN KEEPING a journal in my 16th summer, a few months before I got my first newspaper job, and despite the discouragements inflicted by severe dyslexia, I have done so ever since. Though nearly all these annual collections of notes and letters and poetry fragments and other such personal memorabilia were destroyed by arson in 1983, the dynamic of memorization and recall that is a central part of writing enables me to remember enough of a given event – what occurred and how I felt about it – to be reasonably comfortable applying the first-person form to anything that happened in my life from mid-1956 onward.

But my pre-journal years are notably different: though thanks to my father's encouraging gifts of cameras I was already committed to a lifetime of photography, I remained a boy who had yet to discover the advantage of inked or typewritten paper mnemonics, a reality underscored by the present-day fact that while my pre-journal memories remain vivid, the emotional anesthesia that is both the curse and blessing of nonverbal time has given them a curiously once-removed quality akin to that of film footage or old sepia-toned photographs, of events in which I was an observer rather than a participant or – if reincarnation is more than just a comforting fiction – perhaps of memories from other lifetimes.

Clearly this is why whenever I try to write of my boyhood years before the decisive moment I committed myself also to a lifetime of writing, it seems gravely dishonest to do so in anything other than the third person, presumably a recognition that these circumstances demand the I (and eye) of the autobiographical present be replaced by the visually reportorial he and him – an expression of necessity and therefore not of some Norman Mailer affectation.

There is also the fact that until my emotional and intellectual vocabularies had expended to something approaching maturity – another milestone I associate with journal-keeping and its origin in my decision to study and practice accurate description – there was much that happened during my pre-journal years I frankly found impossible to verbalize until years later; I lacked both the words and the vital sense of metaphorical relationships – for example the clear image of Nature as a womanliness so huge and powerful and yes seductive that even now I can find no adequate synonyms for her timeless magnificence in any language beyond the visual arts or the haunting virtuosity of music. It is especially evident in tribal woodwinds, their summons like fire-blue Clyfford Still brush-strokes against an umber cadence of drums; the heartbeat of a forest; some clear and troutly river that yet murmurs in the Mother Tongue -- all the reflections and emanations of pure wildness and wilderness so beloved of Celtic or First Nations peoples.

The following describes an event I as a boy never dared reveal, one of those pre-journal episodes I can only relate in the third person, a true story I could not write until I was a 70-year-old cripple and no longer gave a damn if people thought me a liar or crazy or both.

Bear in mind too that children of my generation yet enjoyed a freedom that in the United States of today has become not only unthinkable but is in many jurisdictions suppressed as an imaginary felony perpetrated by parents falsely accused of criminal neglect.

*****

THE BOY WALKED in conifer-dappled sunlight along a road so old and unused it was scarcely more than an underbrush-obscured trace through the forest. He had long wondered where the road might lead and what he might find along the way, and now today he followed its hide-and-seek ruts of pale yellow sand westward from the charred remnants of a mysteriously destroyed bridge that in the late 19th Century had briefly sought to span the South Branch of Michigan's Au Sable River.

Local elders called the former bridge-site “The Abutments” and – curiously, the boy thought – spoke of it with the same subtle implied-capitals proper-noun reticence he observed in adult conversations about graveyards and funerals or disasters, a fact the boy had noted immediately. After the boy had seen the reality of the place, the name had perplexed him even more, the quiet weight of its syllables clearly unexplained by what was there: the bridge could never have been anything but a crude structure built of hand-hewn logs, and that scarcely a single lane wide. It had twice briefly spanned a watercourse no more than 30 yards across even at maximum flood. Now, decades later, its telltale relics were merely two pairs of fire-blackened pilings, one pair on each side of the river in the shallows just beyond its banks, each piling a tight cluster of three or four maybe 12-inch diameter logs bound together by wraps of iron cable that had long ago oxidized into bands of dull brown coagulation now barely discernible from the underlying charcoal, each bank's pair matched like gateposts perhaps 10 feet apart.

There was mystery here also, another quality the boy sensed about the place: the fact The Abutments was where his maternal grandfather dug pale-gray clay from the otherwise mostly brightly pebbled riverbed for the boy's aunt to use in her ceramic sculptures. Hence -- or so the boy assumed (because he correctly recognized his mother's older sister as his sole defender amongst maternal kin otherwise poisoned to unrelenting hatefulness by the toxins of dysfunction and divorce) – such a place, if only by its association with the sanctuary of his aunt's studio, should therefore have emanated the same comforting sense of home with which the rest of the river unfailingly welcomed him, its murmur like the gentle voices of women conversing fondly in some immediately adjacent room, voices that sometimes even seemed to call one's name – an eerie but somehow comforting quality the river guides and their adult-fisherman clients would acknowledge only after several whiskeys and about which the boy thus knew to keep silent. But uniquely the clear water that coursed past The Abutments offered no such comfort; it gurgled ominously, and though the bottom beyond its clay-bed shallows and ruined pilings plunged quickly to the come-fish-me depths of big-trout habitat, the boy could not comfortably cast into it or even look long into its cold green shadows without involuntarily shuddering, as if someone had drowned there or something deadly dangerous lurked just out of sight within its strong currents.

As a result everything about The Abutments aroused his curiosity, and he repeatedly questioned his elders about what had happened there until finally his persistence pried out of his maternal grandmother a reluctant, obviously pared-to-the-bones story about bridge-builders twice thwarted by fire that  struck at night and did so inexplicably, without apparent cause or motive, so that after the second blaze had dropped the second span of timbers into the river and for the second time left only monoliths of charred pilings, the builders surrendered to whatever pyromaniacal namelessness seemed to rule there and abandoned not just the bridge but the entire road-building project, never mind it had been hailed as the shortest, easiest-to-complete route from Luzerne to Grayling and back.

Again in that oddly wordless childhood mode of reasoning, the boy soon concluded the reality that echoed in his elders' voices was neither explained by his grandmother's story nor by the fact a place so seemingly innocuous – at least until you peered into its deeper waters – would bear a name so subtly ominous.

Denied all other sources, the boy's curiosity took the sort of quantum-leap that would someday preface his investigative journalism: he began wondering what the road itself might tell him – and now today he intended to find out.

*****

YOU GOT TO the Abutments by a seldom-traveled and severely potholed two-rut road that followed the river maybe a half mile along its west bank downstream from the self-consciously rustic cabins of the sprawling George Mason Estate and ended in the sandy expanse of a turnaround that sloped gently to the water's edge, an obvious if curiously underutilized launching-site for canoes and the AuSable's uniquely long and flat-bottomed riverboats.

Here a Norway pine, the oblong vertical scales of its bark the color of red rust, had sprung from the middle of the intended Luzerne-to-Grayling roadway maybe a dozen yards beyond  where the west end of the bridge had been. The tree had since grown to a towering height, as if it were adding its own exclamation point of obstruction to the message of the fires.

On the river's east bank the old road had long ago vanished, conquered by an unlikely jungle of marsh grass that grew chest-high beneath a grove of white-trunked paper-birch, but here on the west side of the river the way had been preserved well into the 20th Century, probably by hunters using it to access the deep woods beyond. What was now a turnaround had until sometime in the '40s been a riverside junction on the upstream side of the big pine, a 90-degree L-shaped intersection that ended the north-south road from the Mason Estate by connecting it to the remnant of the Luzerne-Grayling road that continued westward toward Grayling to whatever point the roadbuilders had reached when the project was terminated by the fires that twice destroyed their bridge. But this passage too had finally been by closed by winter windfalls that for some unknown reason no one had troubled themselves to clear away and now it was dwindling to just another of the innumerable forgotten tracks that thread northern Lower Michigan's ruggedly mature second-growth forest: scrubby jack pine and its less frequent but far more stately cousins, white pine, blue spruce, other Norway pines like the one that seemed to stand sentry here where the boy began his quest.

It was 1952, near the end of that fondly remembered era when the electric lines and telephone wires went no closer to the South Branch country below Chase Bridge than Grayling, the Crawford County seat a dozen crow-miles further west. Though the entire region had been clear-cut to a biblical barren during the 1860s – raped for profit and then burned to an ashy wasteland by the Great Michigan Fire of 1871 – in '52 its distance from modern utilities had preserved its wildness and fostered the ecological healing that made it also a place of healing for humans. It was middle August, hot and nearly without wind; the sky that pure late-summer-and-early-autumn back-country royal blue you never see much below 44 degrees North latitude; the few clouds white and billowy as raw cotton; the late morning air pungent with sweet fern, loud with birdsong.

The boy's every step flushed huge coveys of those big brown Midwest grasshoppers that always make you think of butterflies as they fly away on purple-black wings edged in yellow or orange. Small for his age, the boy nevertheless had already learned from his father how to move with the watchfulness of a seasoned hunter, the quiet economy of the boy's stride and his obvious comfort in woodland solitude a rebuttal of both their urban origins, his receptivity to his father's teachings probably bolstered by the fraction of First Nations blood inherited from his maternal ancestors, genes that colored his hair black as coal and gave his darkly greenish brown eyes their vaguely Asiatic shape. He was dressed in khaki work clothes and a floppy-brim khaki field hat of the type the Army had issued at the beginning of World War II; he wore a razor-sharp six-inch-blade hunting knife in a brown leather sheath belted on his right hip and carried a .22 rim fire bolt-action Remington target rifle, its six-round clip charged with high-velocity hollow-points, the weapon loaded and locked safe and slung by an oiled leather sling diagonally across his back; the area was infamous for its small but notably deadly Massassauga rattlers, its packs of feral dogs and its occasional rabid animals, but his distinguished-rifleman father had already taught him to shoot so well he feared nothing in his environment, and he was supremely confident of his ability to perceive any incipient risk in time to defend himself against it, especially now in the state of ultra-observant mindfulness his father had taught him during jaunts in the woods and the marksmanship training begun shortly after the boy's fourth birthday. It was an elemental version of paying attention later proven professionally invaluable, eyes focused on nothing yet somehow also on everything, scanning his surroundings seeing whatever might thrust itself into his consciousness: perhaps a snake on which he might otherwise have stepped; perhaps a quick subtle whisk of tail revealing the presence of another mammal whether belligerent or benign; perhaps a discarded tool or the rusted relics of a logging camp from the 19th Century; perhaps a clear-water spring otherwise hidden beneath sweet fern and bracken, its tiny brook expanding to a swamp, a pond, even a new place to fish; perhaps another vanishing passage through the woods; perhaps more of the so-called "Indian Mounds" he sensed might explain the mysteries suggested by the twice-burned bridge and this fading remnant of road.

Songbird morning gave way to cicada afternoon; a vast chorus of insects droned in Gaian harmony; a Yellowhammer drilled a hollow snag for beetles. The day basked in post-Lughnasadh summer fulfillment, at ease with itself.

The road curved slightly upward along a low knoll, dipped toward a shallow basin – now bone dry but every spring a vernal pond – a space shadowed to momentary cool by a dense grove of spruce; the boy welcomed the quick respite from the heat, paused for just a moment to relish it, then walked on.

When he re-entered the dappled sunlight on the far side of the stand of spruce, he remembered that time in Florida when he was six years old and he had wandered away from his playmates and followed a white-sand causeway road deep into the perpetual shade of a cypress swamp; a year earlier on Summer Solstice Eve his mother had tried to murder him and kill his father too, but his father had subdued her and a few weeks after the violent aftermath of frantic adults and sirens and cops his father and his new and obviously loving stepmother had promised him his birthmother was safely locked away forever and that she would never be able to hurt him and that he would never have to see her again. Because it was easier to try to make sense of it when he was alone, he began spending as much time in solitude as the relatively unlimited childhood freedom of that era would allow, but at last in the cypress swamp that afternoon he sensed he was going too far and he stopped walking and looked out over the suddenly ominous expanse of dark water on both sides of the road: the cypress knees reminded him of the swollen ankles of a beggar he had seen on a street corner in downtown Jacksonville and the Spanish moss looked like witch hair on Hallowe'en and off in the distance something big enough to eat him announced its presence with a swirl of disturbing ripples and suddenly he was a little frightened. But he did not run; somehow he already knew better. He merely turned back and walked in the direction from which he had come and when he walked out into the hot sunlight and then beneath the towering shade of a huge tulip poplar growing to his left just outside the swamp a leaf spiraled downward from the tree and touched his forehead and it felt like a kiss, exactly the kind of kiss he had seen other mothers bestow on their own children, and all at once he sensed he was being embraced not by a woman but by something female he could not describe: a sense of womanliness itself, womanliness big as nature that had just kissed him as if to tell him not only that she would be his mother from now on but that unlike his birthmother she would never betray him.

Remembering those moments in Florida momentarily brought to mind his present circumstances. A divorce court had voided the no-contact promise; the boy was in Michigan only because of a judge's bad-luck mandate he summer with his birthmother until he turned 18; he was in the good-luck South Branch region of the Au Sable River wilderness -- which he would realize in old age was the one and only place in the dry-land world he had ever truly felt spiritually at home -- only because that was where his maternal grandparents, upon whom his birthmother would be dependent until their deaths, maintained "the cottage," the vacation home they built on the six remaining acres of the much more vast acreage the state of Michigan had in 1866 awarded his maternal grandmother's father, Henry Heber Woodruff, a Civil War hero and later a state circuit judge.

But now the boy's fleeting and not entirely welcome contemplation of his decidedly mixed fortune was abruptly ended by the raucous jeering of a squadron of blue jays somewhere off to his left in the middle distance. Vaguely startling, it instantly refocused his mind on his quest; he wondered what might have disturbed the jays and remembered a fight he had witnessed between jays and a nest-raiding red squirrel who had climbed the branch-bare lower trunk of the largest of the three blue spruce that grew 10 yards beyond the cottage-wide screened front porch where they ate their summer meals serenaded by the ever-audible voice of the river as it coursed through a cluster of boulders 20 more yards beyond. The squirrel was searching for eggs to suck; the jays had flown at the squirrel before it reached their nest amongst the tree's dense branches and fiercely pecked its head until bright droplets of blood appeared on its russet-colored fur and it abruptly turned and fled down the tree.

But the boy quickly dismissed the jays' warning as having no significance to himself, and so he continued westward, his boot-heels lifting tiny puffs of dust from the sandy spots where the abandoned ruts were not yet overgrown.

Cicadas buzzed and rasped; a woodland aviary of small birds twittered.

A new bird warbled -- its voice clear and compelling as a minor-keyed flute-solo, a brush-stroke of vibrant blue gliding like a caress across the beige canvas of the August afternoon -- a seven-note melody so indescribably exquisite the boy gasped at its beauty.

It was birdsong he had never heard before – a startling but delightful surprise to one who was sure he had already learned every bird and bird call in that forest – and now the call was repeated, again and again, each note drawn out with the same slow poignant sensuality, every note pure as cleanest clearest water, a spirit-caress more powerful than anything his flesh had ever known or imagined.

The boy stopped amidst the dwindling road, gained a few inches of height by stepping atop the weed-grown hump that divided its two faded ruts, searched the surrounding trees, expected to see birds even fractionally as lovely as their song, its compelling suddenness suggesting a mental choreography of something he could not quite remember, perhaps – because already he had begun to understand the associations of sound and color and geometry – a recollection of his aunt at work on one of her paintings while her own daughter practiced the flute, an ephemeral construct of twilight blue and lunar-white he could see in his mind but not verbalize; perhaps though not his Aunt Alecia and his cousin Pamela at all; perhaps (though how could that be?) some phantom echo of memories far older.

He envisioned feathers of green and gold; the size of the song suggested birds at least as big as ravens.

Perhaps someone's parrots had escaped their cage.

He watched, waited; he knew songbirds typically flitted from limb to limb. Surely one of  these wondrous birds would soon move and the boy would spot them all by the motion of one. But jackpine and blue spruce remained birdless. There was nothing save the song – its notes so unfathomably lovely each was its own microcosm of ecstasy.

No, the boy thought, this couldn't be – birdsong so intense and yes getting closer, louder – but no birds anywhere to be seen.

Perhaps it was another human with a flute like that on which he had heard his cousin sometimes practice modal scales curiously similar to the obviously avian melody that now seemed to surrounded him. Perhaps it was somebody with a flute hiding and playing a joke or trying to frighten him.

He thought of tramps, of grubby men said to prey on children.

The boy unslung the Remington, thumb positioned to release its safety, trigger finger resting in readiness on the edge of its blued steel trigger guard: “I'm armed,” he warned; “I'll shoot.”

Yet even as he spoke he sensed the Remington was somehow irrelevant and he reslung it as he realized the forest had absorbed his shout as completely as if he had whispered into a blanket or yelled into a down pillow and he had a fleeting sense of being trapped in one of those awful dreams in which your life depends on your ability to scream but you cannot make your vocal cords produce even a tiny squeak. Yet the boy knew he was not dreaming; he knew it was 1952 on an August mid-afternoon and he was here in the Au Sable country, the only place on earth that felt like it actually welcomed him, and he was wide awake and all the lesser birds and now even all the insects had fallen dead silent yet these birds of the strange indescribably lovely song seemed to be circling directly above him and now yes around him at no more than arm's length yet there were no birds to be seen anywhere and now the color of the day was changing, the air becoming somehow iridescent, darkening to a kind of greenish stormlight though out beyond where he stood on the abandoned road, the sky remained impossibly cloudless and the sun was bright as ever but something inside the darkening air that same arms-length from his face and eerily also of the air itself was shaping itself into what appeared to be a phantom image of an opening, the beginning of a passageway no more substantial than shadow…

Such terror as the boy had never known or imagined engulfed him from head to foot. He became terror personified, terror the verb, terror his entire internal universe.

He turned and fled. He ran east toward the river. He ran harder and faster than he had ever run, probably harder and faster than he would ever run again even under maximum duress. He leapt windfalls, dodged saplings, his lungs painfully craving air, his heart seemingly loud as thunder. He ran until he could no longer hear the strange birds and the forest was again alive with bugsong and casual twittering and there was just the very late August afternoon and the abandoned road and its grasshoppers and the hot westering sun and the air tangy with the cinnamon citrus scent of sweet fern and in the bracken off to his right a whitetail doe with two spotted fawns standing motionless as if amused by his retreat and now finally the Norway pine on guard by the river.

He shrugged out of the Remington's sling and sat himself down at the big Norway pine's suddenly protective base and laid the rifle across his legs and pulled off the hat that had been discarded in 1946 by another maternal aunt's Army Air Corps husband and mopped his sweaty face with the hat's coarse cotton floppiness and leaned back against the tree's rough bark until he finally stopped panting and caught his breath.

The boy was surprised to discover the sun was nearly setting; somehow his hike along the abandoned road and his frantic retreat to the place of The Abutments had taken at least seven hours more than he had realized.

He stood; he unlatched the Remington's safety and lifted its bolt handle so the rifle could not possibly fire and leaned the rifle against the tree, grounding its butt securely enough in the sand it could not slip sideways. Then he strode down to the river and knelt on the damp sand between the western bank's abutments and dowsed his face with double handfuls of the river's icy water. Even now nearly 70 years after the final fire had destroyed the second bridge the close proximity of the charred logs smelled subtly of wet charcoal.

The current gurgled as if in warning. The boy stood again and dried his hands on his pantlegs and fetched the Remington and restored it to locked-safety readiness and slung it diagonally across his back and picked up the sweat-darkened hat and put it on his head and began walking the river road quickly upstream toward his grandparents' vacation home.

Later that night while he could still remember the melody he whistled it for his grandmother, asking if she knew what species of bird it might be.

No,” she said, focusing on the boy with a lingering glance so acutely searching it seemed to him she looked not at him but more deeply into him than anyone had ever looked, and for an instant he glimpsed in the robin's-egg blue of her eyes a vastly older and more purely wild female spirit somehow close kin to the powerful womanliness he had sensed in the kiss of that falling poplar-leaf in Florida.

No,” the boy's grandmother repeated; “there's no bird alive in these woods sings like that.”

*****

TWO DECADES AFTERWARD, In what would become one of the most memorable moments of the 24 years of evenings, weekends and vacations I worked on my own time to document what I still regard as the 20th Century's biggest unreported story – the beginning of anti-patriarchal global revolution implicit in the old Counterculture's eerily spontaneous resurrection of the breathtakingly ancient ethos of the Great Goddess – I happened in my research to read of a phenomenon described in pre-Christian Celtic myth as "the Birds of Rhiannon": goddess-sent messengers feathered green and gold, avian couriers dispatched by Rhiannon herself either as a dire warning or as a summons that is fated and therefore cannot be refused, their song said to be the most hauntingly exquisite music in the universe. They are said to dwell in another dimension, which is why they remain invisible even when they sound as if they are within reach.

Until that reading I had never so much as imagined a connection between my odd late-boyhood encounter in the Michigan woods and my growing certainty the pagan-liturgy-resurrecting folk renaissance of the later 1950s was the beginning of an event far greater than itself; I assumed the compulsion that since my 19th year and my second quarter at the University of Tennessee had nagged me to pursue the story wherever it might lead was merely journalistic intuition on overdrive. But having learned of the Birds of Rhiannon, I could only begin to wonder if my efforts were far less self-assigned than I had imagined them to be.

And apropos that missing time, now (18 April 2024) in what by post-Covid diagnosis is most likely at age 84 my penultimate year, I cannot but wonder if I entered that passageway, and if that from which I fled in such terror seven hours later was not the Goddess-centered blessedness I like a latter-day Thomas Rhymer might have witnessed therein, but the prophecy of endless wretchedness implicit in its mandate that I spend the rest of my life (as indeed I have) struggling to convey its species-preserving exquisiteness to mostly hostile audiences.

Wretchedness indeed: for the remainder of my childhood and adolescence and nearly all my adulthood, I was ruled by my left brain. I was outspokenly, even caustically agnostic, and I was profoundly skeptical of all so-called spiritual or religious experience including my own, but in that instant of reading I was smitten by a gooseflesh chill so powerfully indicative I knew what had shown itself to me in those Michigan woods was nothing less than what Robert Graves calls “poetic truth,” and I remembered the odd piercing look my grandmother had given me when I whistled for her the song of those ineffable birds of strange, her eyes with their almost surreptitious flash of recognition an involuntary reflex that by 1972 I had learned is a telling characteristic of women who are in touch with the goddess-symbol even if they cannot (or dare not) speak her name – women who, had my "Glimpses of a Pale Dancer" not been destroyed by arson just as it seemed on the brink of mainstream publication, might themselves have said of it what my late friend Helen Farias said to me after reading its earliest draft in the spring of 1971: “you have given me the words to describe what I have always known to be true but never had the vocabulary to express, and I cannot thank you enough.”

Since my 70s, I have recognized Helen's praise as among the finest, most telling, most significant accolades of my life.

And eventually Helen would express her gratitude in the best way possible: in 1987, returned stateside with her intellectual prowess confirmed by a Master of Fine Arts degree from the prestigious University of London, she founded the quarterly Beltane Papers and its monthly supplement Octava, journals of feminist spirituality that steadily gained credibility and circulation until metastasized breast cancer -- eerily the fatal plague of so many feminist activists -- killed her on the autumnal equinox of 1994.

No matter my “Dancer” had been burned to cinders 11 years earlier, undoubtedly because the government and its owners regard any real threat to patriarchy as dangerously subversive; no matter the spare-time, 24-year reportorial investigation that was to have been my bridge to prosperity and the crowning glory of my journalism career died in flames with its irreplaceable research notes and its forever lost photography and all the rest of my life's work, text and pictures alike. No matter the fire was ignited at literally at the same instant I was meeting with a well-known Manhattan book-editor1 who was assuring me she could mother "Dancer" to mainstream publication, insisting it would be one of the 20th Century's most influential volumes; no matter but for the fire I would have scooped the world on this the first visible wave of our species' survive-or-die revolution against patriarchal ecogenocide -- our first obvious mustering against the Apocalypse the patriarchs and their direct descendants the Capitalists are intentionally inflicting on us all. No matter the indescribable pain of loss and defeat remains the branding-iron on my psyche and the knife-blade in my heart it has been since the fire and ever shall be for as long as my consciousness survives. The odyssey that now in retrospect seems the irresistible mandate of that long ago August afternoon in the Au Sable River country yet prevails as my own solitary quest, its beginning a priceless gift I failed to recognize until 18 years after the fact, now in the brutally honest retrospection of terminal old age an almost-sacramental confirmation that endures even amidst the ashes and inescapable poverty of my post-fire existence. No matter there will never be for me any professional laurels or material gain from it; in the emotional, spiritual, purely aesthetic sense it remains as compelling as ever, precisely as Robert Graves proclaims in the poem entitled "To Juan at the Winter Solstice":

Her sea-blue eyes were wild
But nothing promised that is not performed.
2

_______________________________

1The late Cicely Nichols, a longtime friend and one of the primary facilitators of Sisterhood is Powerful (Vintage Books edition: 1970), acknowledged as "a sister in struggle" to whom the anthology's editor Robin Morgan is "especially grateful.." 

2Graves, Robert; The Poems of Robert Graves, Doubleday Anchor Books, New York: 1958 (pgs. 200-201)

*****
LB/May 2010-January 2011 (with additional minor editing to improve accessibility and eliminate typos, 2018-2019; 2022; 2024; 2025.)

-30-

 

 

04 October 2025

Censorship: Lessons from Ralph Nader and a Knoxville Atrocity

(Originally published 08 September 2013; republished here 4 October 2025 after the original publisher, TypePad, destroyed its archives and went out of business.)

*********

RALPH NADER, FOR whom I have never voted but for whom I have the greatest respect, has written for Reader Supported News a denunciation of President Barack Obama that will undoubtedly be noted by historians as the most bravely outspoken such commentary by any public figure to date.

Hence I urge all of you not just to read it but to disseminate it as widely as possible and communicate your approval to RSN, even if only with a word or two, as in the traditional “Yes man yes!” by which we long-ago beatniks used to shout our approval of exceptional poetry or music. My own applause is already included in the associated comment thread.

That said, in the interest of full disclosure and as a long-overdue expression of gratitude, I should acknowledge I owe Nader a big debt of thanks. In 1964 he entrusted me with the revelations that, a year later, would be published in Unsafe at Any Speed, his exposé of capitalism in action, specifically of how the U.S. automobile manufacturers were maximizing profits by minimizing vehicular safety.

At the time I was the sports editor and one of three news-reporter/photographers for The Oak Ridger, a small but notably excellent East Tennessee daily. It was in acknowledgment of all these roles I had been assigned to interview Nader about his research. Not only had I added car stuff to our sports coverage -- I was then the proud owner of a 1958 Porsche super-coupe -- I had also demonstrated a knack for unusual news stories, and Nader's findings felt like the biggest scoop of my career to date. But this piece never saw the proverbial light of day. It was killed by Managing Editor Dick Smyser, who in one of those indicative ironies of USian history was also the chairman of the Associated Press Managing Editors' Freedom of Information Committee.

It was my second bitter schooling in the harsh realities of censorship that are cleverly hidden beneath the claim the United States has “freedom of the press,” and it was memorably painful because I had expected better -- much better -- from The Oak Ridger. Why? Because its top executives, Publisher Don McKay, Business Manager Tom Hill and Smyser himself had been courageous enough to hire me despite The Knoxville Journal's continuing effort to slander me into professional and personal oblivion.

That episode is a story unto itself. I had worked for The Journal since September 1957, first as a part-time sports stringer through the fall of 1959, when finances forced me to drop out of college and sign up for a six-year hitch in the U.S. Army. In September 1962, having served 16 months in Korea and finished my required three-year term of active duty, I returned to Knoxville and was immediately rehired by The Journal as a full-time staff sportswriter. Obviously the paper liked me and my reporting; Assistant Sports Editor Ben Byrd once told me he believed I was destined for The New York Times or some equally prestigious publication.

But on 2 June 1963, a raid by a combined force of Knoxville cops and Knox County sheriff's deputies jailed a racially mixed group of 40 men and women on charges I knew to be utterly without basis in fact. I had been there, had been arrested and on the strength of my press card subsequently released, and now -- naive idiot that I was -- I believed I could convince Journal Editor/Publisher Guy L. Smith and City Editor Dick Evans the arrests were at the very least a terrible mistake and more probably a deliberate atrocity. Soon Smith and Evans concluded I was what in the parlance of the Jim Crow South was called a “nigger-lover” -- probably a Communist as well -- and Smith had me re-arrested in his newsroom, then publicly fired me on Page One of his newspaper.

My termination notice was a maliciously slanderous story by Ron McMahan, who knowingly wrote a deliberate Big Lie that would have been equally at home in Adolf Hitler's Völkischer Beobachter: “Forty Negroes and whites, most of them students at the University of Tennessee, were arrested early Sunday morning during what police described as 'a drunken sex orgy' at a South Knoxville residence...Booked at county jail on a charge of disorderly conduct was Loren Bliss, 23, of 1537 Laurel Avenue, a former Journal sportswriter.”

There was of course neither orgy nor drunkenness; the gathering was nothing more than a quiet garden party, attended by nearly as many UT faculty members, civil rights activists, young local professionals and business executives as older students. It celebrated the graduation of a woman named Maline Robinson, who had just earned a master-of-fine-arts degree from UT and who would later teach art history at the University of Wisconsin. Despite The Journal's lurid prose (“partly-clad couples were lying all over the front lawn...on tables, in closets and on the floor...Lewdness charges were not placed against anyone because during the melee everyone scattered”), the sexual allegations were nothing more than typical fabrications of the forever undiminished, never-to-be-quenched hatefulness that rules the vindictively pornographic Southron mind. Such is the racist fear, blood-lust and never-to-be-acknowledged envy implicit in the old joke that asks, “what is ten inches long and white,” then answers, “nothing.”

That the police raid occurred just as the local Ku Klux Klan and its many affiliated mainstream churches were pulpit-pounding against “interracial love feasts” was hardly coincidental. Martin Southern, the ironically named American Civil Liberties Union lawyer in Knoxville, said he believed the raid had been carefully planned by a cabal of high ranking officials at UT, the sheriff's office and the police department plus top executives of The Journal and The Knoxville News-Sentinel to facilitate purging not only the university but the entire Knoxville area of anyone the local Ruling Class deemed “trouble-makers” and/or “outside agitators.”

Southern warned me that because I was the one genuinely credible witness to everything that had actually occurred -- he said I was “the fly, as it were, in the segregationist ointment” -- my own life was probably in danger. Not many days later, a would-be killer tried to invade my ground-floor apartment via its kitchen window, but the attempted hit was thwarted by my vigilant German shepherd Brunhilda and my own expert-class skill with a handgun -- a story for another time. For now suffice it to say dear Brunhilda quickly got to the meat of the problem, bit the malefactor in his blue-jeaned crotch, seized him by his penis and testicles and dragged him down from the window just as I was aligning my sights on the bridge of his nose to shoot him between the eyes.

Meanwhile Marion Barry, then Tennessee field secretary for the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, later the mayor of Washington D.C., had arranged for me to cover the mass-arrest story for a local African-American weekly.

But that report too was extensively censored, not by Blacks but by two white civil rights activists, Congress of Racial Equality1 members Steve Wagner2 and Phillip Bacon, who inadvertently revealed their own white-supremacist beliefs by insisting accurate description of the incident's more telling moments would be too much truth for Black readers and would therefore discredit the narrative as “sensationalism.”

In other words -- bottom line --  Moron Nation's meticulously conditioned hatred of the First Amendment had suddenly become as evident on the USian Left as it had always been on the USian Right.

Thus to my eternal regret I surrendered to the two CORE activists, allowing them to cut several key passages from my original text. One of the most important disclosures Wagner and Bacon whited-out  -- pun intended -- was the word-for-word report on my confrontation with Smith, in which the Nazi-sympathizing publisher/editor had made it clear I would either obey his command to fabricate a dangerously provocative Big Lie describing an interracial sex orgy that never took place, or I would suffer grave but unspecified professional afflictions in retaliation for my disobedience. Wagner and Bacon also suppressed every word of my eyewitness account of the police assault on Milton Vargas, a Panamanian diplomat who was among the party's invited guests. Never mind I was less than six feet away and saw and heard everything that happened: Vargas, neatly clad in a dark suit, white shirt and dark necktie, politely held out his diplomatic credentials to one of the invading Knoxville cops, saying "excuse me, I am..." but the cop interrupted him, snarling "yew a goddamn Mexican nigger, an yew better shut yore mouth" as he slapped Vargas' identity papers to the floor and slugged him in the face -- a wanton violation of diplomatic immunity so outrageous it provoked several days of anti-U.S. riots in Panama. As to the post-party attempt on my life -- the that arguably confirmed attorney Southern's hypothesis of a Rightist conspiracy far broader than a incident mere police raid -- Wagner and Bacon were nearly hysterical in their insistence no public mention ever be made of it.  

Barry allowed these white bourgeois tyrannies only because he believed -- probably correctly -- such compromise was vital to retain the Caucasian support implicit in the slogan, "Black and White Together."  The following, under my own byline, is all that remained after Bacon and Wagner finished censoring it. It's from the 3 August 1963 edition of The Knoxville Flashlight-Herald:

Although The Knoxville Journal had opportunity to publish a staff member's eye-witness account of the now-famed graduation party held for some University of Tennessee students by Mr. and Mrs. Malcolm Ottaway, it declined to utilize that source and relied instead upon police and sheriff's reports.

That those reports were something less than reliable has since been proven in Knox County Sessions Court.

This writer, at the time a sports reporter for The Journal, attended the party with friends and was subsequently arrested, then freed after deputies learned he was a Journal staff member. He was re-arrested and booked some 14 hours later after unsuccessfully attempting to interest Journal City Editor Dick Evans in a factual account of events before and during the arrests...

Included in this writer's report would have been a statement that the party was quiet and proper despite the number of persons present and information that police and deputies had acted without grounds...

Those taken to city jail, where there is a drunkometer (a Breathalyzer by which suspects can challenge a drunkenness charge), were not charged with drunkenness, but those taken to county jail, where there is no drunkometer, were charged with drunkenness in addition to disorderly conduct...

Cases against those charged by Knox County, including this writer, were dismissed July 1. City Court cases were continued by order of Journal-supported Judge Charles Kelly and will be heard in October.

Included on the city docket is Milton Vargas, the Panamanian Vice-Consul here. Mr. Vargas, who has filed a full report with the Panamanian government, has charged he was slapped by police officers...

The only uncensored coverage of the arrests was provided by TASS -- Tyelyegrafnoye agyentstvo Sovyetskogo Soyuza or Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union. The story appeared on page one of Pravda, as I recall in the 5 June edition. It was also -- or so I was told by several UT students -- broadcast in English by Radio Moscow, as were reports of the subsequent Panama riots.  

Given the prurient hatefulness that so often defines southern racism, The Oak Ridger's bravery in hiring me in mid-August, even before all the court cases had been decided, was beyond exceptional. Indeed, since The Journal's vindictively aggressive slanders were blacklisting me even amongst Northern employers, until The Oak Ridger came to my rescue I had feared my journalism career was over.

Which brings us back to Ralph Nader. Maybe a year after the Knoxville incident, he was in Oak Ridge visiting his sister, a scientist with some big-league connection to what today would be called the nuclear energy cartel. My boss Dick Smyser arranged for me to interview Nader,  exactly where I no longer remember. What I do recall is that I questioned Nader for hours, that eventually we adjourned to continue the interview at his sister's apartment, and that after I photographed him with the paper's Polaroid-back Speed Graphic, we talked literally until dawn.

Nader doubted the story would run. Citing the paper's bold defiance of the region's ubiquitous racism, I assured him it would.

Then I drove from his sister's place directly to the The Oak Ridger building on Tyrone Road, put the sports page to bed as quickly as I could and hammered out the Nader story on my issue Royal Standard typewriter. My lead said something like “'Unsafe at any speed' -- that's how Ralph Nader describes many of Detroit's best-selling automobiles.” The second graf laid out Nader's credentials -- a Harvard-educated lawyer, he had been campaigning for safer cars since the late 1950s -- and the remainder detailed his complaints against Chevrolet's Corvair. The text ran to at least six takes -- six double-spaced typewritten pages of about 300 words apiece.

Despite the befogged mind that even at age 24 is the penance we pay for a sleepless all-nighter, I thought I'd done a damn fine job of reporting. But -- perhaps not the least because Smyser himself drove a sherbet-green Corvair -- the story evoked not the anticipated thank you for the warning but instead provoked him to such fury, he shouted his denunciation the length of the newsroom, visibly startling the other members of the five-person staff. It was one of  two times he actually raged at me -- the only occasions I ever heard him raise his voice at anyone.  

That other episode, again in the newsroom  -- once more startling my colleagues with its volume (and this time a personal attack shouted into my face at bad-breath range) -- was his response to my rejection of the ballistic impossibilities set forth as gospel by the Warren Commission. It was late in 1964, a post-deadline afternoon, probably on a Friday and therefore normally a time of relaxation, but Smyser had surprised us all by interrogating each of us about our reactions to the commission's report. (Its 888 pages had been summarized by the Associated Press in a 366-page hardbound book distributed as a freebie to news staffers at AP-member dailies and peddled for $1 apiece by their circulation departments or given away as a bonus to new subscribers.) Smyser's questions, I remember, made me very uncomfortable; they were obviously phrased to compel agreement with the commission's findings. The rest of the staff dutifully submitted. I -- an expert shot with rifles and handguns since my teens and already well versed in the technical aspects of ballistics -- could not. Smyser responded by damning me at the top of his voice, his bespectacled face red with rage, denouncing me as an uppity brat so stupidly arrogant I dared question government authority.

From then on, for the few more weeks I remained at The Oak Ridger, his simmering hostility, an entirely new element in our relationship, convinced me my answer had put my continued employment  at grave risk -- one of the many reasons I fled back to my New-York-City birthplace in the first week of 1965. In those days, before the socioeconomic cleansing euphemistically disguised as gentrification, the City truly was what James Baldwin had so perceptively labeled it in his 1962 novel: Another Country

Twenty years later, in conversations with other New York City journalists -- all of whom had been working elsewhere as reporters in 1964 --  I would learn the same sorts of editorial-staff interrogations had taken place on most (if not all) U.S. dailies -- for me the first conclusive evidence not only of the assassination conspiracy itself but of the extent to which upper-echelon management of the Mainstream Media Propaganda Machine (MMPM) was actively collaborating with the government to ensure no  "accredited" journalist  dared question the Warren Commission's findings.  By then -- the 1980s -- we knew that "government" was in fact the Central Intelligence Agency, which since the early 1950s has controlled MMPM for our Masters, much as the Gestapo controlled German media for Hitler and Goebbels.

Though in 1964 I never dared say so to anyone save my lover, I had already concluded the murder of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was  some sort of cleverly disguised coup. My suspicions were kindled by AP reports out of Dallas in the minutes and hours immediately after the killing, some of which indicated the president had been slain by multiple shooters, with at least one assassin firing from the infamous grassy knoll.  Suspicion solidified to near certainty when Jack Ruby murdered Lee Harvey Oswald on 24 November -- a killing typical of the clean-up operations by which the world's intelligence agencies insure their crimes are kept secret -- an atrocity I watched live on NBC television in a Bristol, Va, hotel room over breakfast with my then lover, an art major at Virginia Intermont College. I will never forget how, immediately after Oswald was shot, she turned to me, horror-stricken olive-green eyes brimming with tears,  and whispered exactly what I was thinking: "my god, we live in a banana republic." 

All that said,  Smyser was nevertheless a notably skillful editor, one who taught me a great many useful lessons about reporting. Even so, my memory still flinches at how he shouted down my objection to the Warren Commission's "magic bullet" hypothesis  and how he grimaced as he dropped the Nader copy into the circular gray waist-high trash bin that stood guard beside his desk. His expression suggested he was disposing of something grossly distasteful, at least as repugnant as a cat turd.

When I phoned Nader later than day and apologetically told him there would be no story, he nevertheless thanked me for my effort. Years after that I realized I was the one who should have thanked him -- not just for all the time he spent telling me about the built-in hazards of those Detroit cars, but for the lesson in journalistic reality.

Such is the USian variant of a “free press,” its invisible restrictions so effective, no official censorship is necessary, the result uncomfortably reminiscent of the society typified by a slogan in George Orwell's breathtakingly prophetic 1984: “Ignorance Is Strength.”

_________________________
1The Congress of Racial Equality, CORE -- the martyrdom of activists James Chaney, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner not withstanding -- has since been credibly exposed both as a front for the global energy cartel and as a cover for domestic operations of the Central Intelligence Agency -- see examples here, here (scroll to "Just as the Phoenix program...") and here.  Hence I cannot but wonder if the CIA was the real source of the censorship by which Wagner and Bacon purged my Flashlight-Herald report of its most vital details.

2I am uncertain as to the correct spelling of Wagner -- there are at least three possibilities --  and I thus apologize if I have misspelled his familial name. But apart from the few Oak Ridger and Knoxville Journal reports that were with me in my clip book (my portfolio of best published stories), the arsonist(s) destroyed all my records of those years; in fact -- outside my two working portfolios (text and photographs) -- absolutely nothing of my 1956-1969 work, journals and personal correspondence included -- survived the 1 September 1983 fire.    

LB/8 September 2013 (Additional details added 8 June and 9 September 2020)

-30-